ViviTheMage
Lifer
I wish I could work on little projects like that all day 🙁.
so fun!
so fun!
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Speaking of crazy whacked out weather, remember when this was on the TV 24/7 non-stop for a week?
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=38&threadid=1992366
I haven't, but now I will. 😉Originally posted by: Rubycon
Ever take an LED fan and hold it in a stiff wind? Those commutatorless motors make fairly decent low yield gennies. 😉
It works great! 😀Originally posted by: nakedfrog
I might just steal that idea for a UPS.
😀Originally posted by: Rubycon
Try making a ring of fire.
All you need is a MOT (Microwave Oven Transformer) and a motor. It's basically a rotary spark gap running with no capacitance. (as it would in a Tesla circuit)
EDIT: I must stress the hazard of a MOT. It is a LETHAL amount of power - at 2,000 volts at one half ampere, contact with such potential WILL kill you. Spark carefully. 😀
Originally posted by: Eli
Edit: I was thinking about the whole hydrogen project/energy thing.. At its core, my goal is to be able to run an engine/generator using hydrogen for less money than it would cost if I were to do the same thing using gasoline.
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Eli
Edit: I was thinking about the whole hydrogen project/energy thing.. At its core, my goal is to be able to run an engine/generator using hydrogen for less money than it would cost if I were to do the same thing using gasoline.
Hmm...I haven't done the actual calculations, but considering electricity is a fairly high-quality power source, wouldn't it be cheaper to produce it from natural gas via the water-gas shift reaction?
Neat project...I have a friend who's trying to convert a car engine to steam power.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Since it takes more energy to extract hydrogen/oxygen from water than you'd get by burning it, you incur a net loss performing that process. The more direct you can get to your fuel source, the more efficient you'll be.
If he just wants to run an engine, it will be more efficient simply burning gasoline than trying to break down water and burning the byproducts.
If he wants to turn a generator with it, it would be far more efficient to just buy the electricity from a utility. Since a generator is normally used when you have no power, his best bet would be to get a diesel generator. But that wouldn't be any fun.
Yeah, exactly.Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Since it takes more energy to extract hydrogen/oxygen from water than you'd get by burning it, you incur a net loss performing that process. The more direct you can get to your fuel source, the more efficient you'll be.
If he just wants to run an engine, it will be more efficient simply burning gasoline than trying to break down water and burning the byproducts.
If he wants to turn a generator with it, it would be far more efficient to just buy the electricity from a utility. Since a generator is normally used when you have no power, his best bet would be to get a diesel generator. But that wouldn't be any fun.
Perhaps I should rephrase my post. I understand thermodynamics fairly well, so my question wasn't whether his little project will actually save money (obviously not), but whether making hydrogen would be cheaper if he bought electricity from the power company and used his electrolysis setup, or if he extracted it from methane.