- Oct 1, 2002
- 1,920
- 0
- 0
when i tried winamp5, i got pissed off that it took longer than winamp2 to load, so i went back to 2.91. today, i was tipped off to winamp5 lite, and i was pleased to find it loads quickly and is the same goodness as 2.91... none of that strange shape skinning crap either.
but heres the thing: if winamp5 is based off winamp2, with added media library and skinning ability, and winamp 5 lite is 5 without the media library and skinning... what have they done with it? i see theyve changed the first song shuffle bug, which is a plus... but what else did they change, for better or worse?
but heres the thing: if winamp5 is based off winamp2, with added media library and skinning ability, and winamp 5 lite is 5 without the media library and skinning... what have they done with it? i see theyve changed the first song shuffle bug, which is a plus... but what else did they change, for better or worse?