Win2K or Whistler?

BCYL

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
7,803
0
71
For now go with win2k first... but once Whistler comes out and become stable, you can then decide if you wanna upgrade or not...
 

FOBSIDE

Platinum Member
Mar 16, 2000
2,178
0
0
win2k has proven itself to be a good operating system. who knows if whistler will end up being like ME. go with win2k for now is my vote.
 

PowerJoe

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
887
0
0
Windows ME = Windows 98 third edition
Windows 2000 = NT5
Windows Whistler = NT5.1

Whistler is more like 2000 that ME.

-PJ
 

smp

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
5,215
0
76
You guys mean to tell me that I can't install Win2K because it doesn't support ata 100? Cause the Win2K setup doesn't recognize my hard drive.. ???
 

Gouky

Member
Dec 12, 2000
122
0
0
About win2k not regognizing these extra controler cards... i was able to install win2k by providing my ultra66 driver disk as an additional scsi driver when you begin the install. i think that screen might only appear if youère doing a fresh install, on an upgrade it might not ask and you might lose your hard drive 1/2 way trough the install and fail till you reformat.

if someone needs more help with this, feel free to ask me specific questions, i can awnser them, i remember though, it's a pain in the but to install win2k on an unsuported controler card.
 

dcdomain

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2000
5,158
0
71
Your drives should automatically drop down to ata66. Win2k should install fine. Both of my drives are ata100, and I had no problems installing Win2k.
 

GT1999

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
5,261
1
71
I've used Whistler Beta 1 and it's a GREAT OS. The only thing I don't like about it is the nasty start menu, which you can change back (and I recommend you do, to). I'm using W2k now and games work great. I play CS, Q3, AOEII, and some others.