Win2000 Pro Defrag Utility - Microsoft or Norton?

[stretch]

Which is the better defrag util? Microsoft's own that comes with Windows 2000 or Norton Utilities 2001 Speed Disk?

 

[kmmatney]

I have both on my system, and can't say one is any better than the other. The built-in one is a "light" version of Diskkeeper, which was/is considered the best defrag tools for WinNT. I received my copy of Norton Utilities 2001 from work so it was free. The only advantage of Norton Speed Disk is that you can easily schedule defrag runs.

 

[murdock2525]

Only diskeeper 6.0 Defrags the paging file so it is a must,,,,,,
I'm not familiar with the Norton stuff because after messing with their AV and Ghost, I deremined their products to junk, prepackaged gameboy crap, which they are.

 

[stretch]

Well, if what kmmatney says is correct (and it certainly seems so), I might as well use DK Lite and then defrag the page file with the free page/registry defrag from sysinternals. Wouldn't you agree?