Win xp 128Ram or 256Ram

mikeshn

Senior member
Oct 9, 2001
367
0
0
I'm running WinXp pro on Pentium 3 733Mhz, 128Ram. For me at seems slowly. If I add 128Ram more, than it will more faster. Or I wouldn't see the effect.
Thanks
 

ojai00

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2001
3,291
1
81
You'll probably get faster load times. I think the minimum for XP should be 256, with the recommended being 512. Hope this helps.
 

bacillus

Lifer
Jan 6, 2001
14,517
0
71


<< I think the minimum for XP should be 256, >>


MS says the minimum is 128Mb but for most folk 256Mb is what's needed for smooth running!
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
I think you will definately see an improvement, XP on 128 is a bit painfull ;) I try to make any new XP machines have 512, but as others said 256 should be a noticable step up.
Bill
 

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
Go for 512 it will make a BIG difference!
I had 256 and it still seemed to dog on me at times, bumped up to 512 and it ran much better, then i went back to Win2k =)
 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
No less than 256, any less than that and your HDD will be working overtime.
 

WilsonTung

Senior member
Aug 25, 2001
487
0
0
Running XP on a 128 MB machine here, but I have all the theme services and all the other gizmos turned off.
 

MoFunk

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
4,058
0
0
My WinXP system is using 233 meg of ram right now! I have 2 mozilla windows open, outlook 2000, 2 word windows and seti cli with a few others background programs. You should really get 512. You will thank yourself for it!
 

Gomce

Senior member
Dec 4, 2000
812
0
76
if you have money go with 512,
I am happy with 256 mb, eye candy turned off because I like simplicity, and some services are off too, like indexing, wave device for modem, some printing help services, and the system restore is off too..etc etc.
now I have Winamp running and Opera 6.0 with around 40 windows open and only 125 mb are being used,
once I had 512 mb ram but to tell you the truth I didn't notice difference, in fact 3dmark 2k1 was slower, becase more sticks of ram means more latency.

So, I reccomend 256 mb, don't let these people's bragging get to you.

(p.s. when I tryed 3 x 256 mb of ram on my Ex-motherboard Abit Kt7Raid, the board died, maybe the memory controller or something :) so more doesn't always mean merrier)