Note: This thread is not about the RIAA and the lawsuit, or who is bad who is good or if the $4.95/mo deal gives any money to the artist or anything like that. It's about the select percentage of people that enjoy opening their lines to send out hundreds of songs on Napster.
What do you think. Personally I firmly believe that the vast majority of the Napster file servers out there are geeks like you and me with large bandwidths that open our connections to the drones of the Napster world. I and many others get a kick out of it seeing hundreds of songs go out on my box every day.
The day Napster tells me that I must pay them to use my upload line is the day I set my uploads to zero. Which looks like now.
With less people like me serving out hundreds of songs the few that are left will get bombarded with requests and eventually driven offline. Content goes down, use base goes down.
What do you think?
Dirk
What do you think. Personally I firmly believe that the vast majority of the Napster file servers out there are geeks like you and me with large bandwidths that open our connections to the drones of the Napster world. I and many others get a kick out of it seeing hundreds of songs go out on my box every day.
The day Napster tells me that I must pay them to use my upload line is the day I set my uploads to zero. Which looks like now.
With less people like me serving out hundreds of songs the few that are left will get bombarded with requests and eventually driven offline. Content goes down, use base goes down.
What do you think?
Dirk
Facebook
Twitter