• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Will The GOP Nuke The Constitution?

GrGr

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2003
3,204
1
76
Will The GOP Nuke The Constitution?
December 21, 2004
Arianna Huffington

Right now, somewhere in the White House, administration strategists are hatching plans to go to war. Battle plans are being drawn. Timing and tactics are being finalized. A nuclear option is even being openly discussed.

The designated target? Iran? Syria? North Korea?

No, much closer to home: the United States Senate.

Salivating at the chance to radically remake the Supreme Court, the president and his loyal lapdogs in the World's Most Exclusive Club are plotting to obliterate over 200 years of Senate tradition by eliminating the use of filibusters against judicial nominees.

The Robert's Rules of Disorder scheme would involve ? who else? ? Vice President Dick Cheney, in his role as presiding Senate officer, ruling that judicial filibusters are unconstitutional and Majority Leader Bill Frist squashing the Democrats' inevitable objection to such an edict by tabling the motion. As long as we're "spreading democracy" abroad, no reason to leave out the home front, right?

This is the so-called "nuclear option," embraced with a wink and a nudge by Frist in November when he told the conservative Federalist Society: "One way or another, the filibuster of judicial nominees must end."

Invoking this parliamentary dirty trick would eliminate unlimited debate on judicial nominations and lower the number of votes needed before a nominee can be confirmed from the 60 necessary to break a filibuster to a simple majority of 51, and would drive a stake through the heart of the Senate's longstanding commitment ? indeed one of its founding purposes ? to defending the rights of the minority.

This scorched-earth approach is entirely in keeping with what Time magazine lauds this week as President Bush's "ten-gallon-hat leadership" style ? a my-way-or-the-highway approach rooted in arrogance and laced with an intolerance of dissent that has already delivered him a rubber stamp Cabinet. Now he wants a rubber stamp Senate.

etc.

--------------------

Not to mention a rubber stamp CIA. See, everything is much easier when you can simply dictate what is to be done.

 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
These are the same people who want a US constitutional amendment to restrict homosexuals from marrying. They have conrol of all three branches of government.

What else is on their social agenda?

State led Evangelical Christian prayer in schools

Oppression of homosexuals or anyone else they do not approve of.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Since they don't need them right now, then they are bad. A typical right-wing rationalization.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Since they don't need them right now, then they are bad. A typical right-wing rationalization.

You hit the nail directly on the head...as soon as protections protect the other guy, many people want to get rid of those protections. The really funny part here is that as bad as the Republicans are trying to fvck over the Democrats here, the Republicans will be on the receiving end before long. Because getting rid of protections for those WITHOUT the majority will only be to their benefit until they are the minority again. Then they will scream bloody murder when a Democratic president pushes the ever hated judicial activists through a Democratic Senate and there will be nothing the Republicans can do about it.

Idiots.
 

Vadatajs

Diamond Member
Aug 28, 2001
3,475
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Since they don't need them right now, then they are bad. A typical right-wing rationalization.

You hit the nail directly on the head...as soon as protections protect the other guy, many people want to get rid of those protections. The really funny part here is that as bad as the Republicans are trying to fvck over the Democrats here, the Republicans will be on the receiving end before long. Because getting rid of protections for those WITHOUT the majority will only be to their benefit until they are the minority again. Then they will scream bloody murder when a Democratic president pushes the ever hated judicial activists through a Democratic Senate and there will be nothing the Republicans can do about it.

Idiots.

Not only that, but republicans themselves have fillibustered judicial nominees in the past.
 

HombrePequeno

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2001
4,657
0
0
WILL they nuke the constitution? That's a dumb question. The constitution has been constantly shat upon by both parties for decades.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
The constitution's importance is relative to it's helpfulness or hindrance to the GOP agenda.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Since they don't need them right now, then they are bad. A typical right-wing rationalization.

You hit the nail directly on the head...as soon as protections protect the other guy, many people want to get rid of those protections. The really funny part here is that as bad as the Republicans are trying to fvck over the Democrats here, the Republicans will be on the receiving end before long. Because getting rid of protections for those WITHOUT the majority will only be to their benefit until they are the minority again. Then they will scream bloody murder when a Democratic president pushes the ever hated judicial activists through a Democratic Senate and there will be nothing the Republicans can do about it.

Idiots.

Not only that, but republicans themselves have fillibustered judicial nominees in the past.



When?
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
WILL they nuke the constitution? That's a dumb question. The constitution has been constantly shat upon by both parties for decades.

But you're forgetting....Bush has a MANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNDATE!

The constitution is kindling soon enough.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Since they don't need them right now, then they are bad. A typical right-wing rationalization.

You hit the nail directly on the head...as soon as protections protect the other guy, many people want to get rid of those protections. The really funny part here is that as bad as the Republicans are trying to fvck over the Democrats here, the Republicans will be on the receiving end before long. Because getting rid of protections for those WITHOUT the majority will only be to their benefit until they are the minority again. Then they will scream bloody murder when a Democratic president pushes the ever hated judicial activists through a Democratic Senate and there will be nothing the Republicans can do about it.

Idiots.

Not only that, but republicans themselves have fillibustered judicial nominees in the past.

When?

Those with eyes closed cannot see. ^^^^
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,379
47,663
136
I love it when they bring out their current slogan 'tyranny of the minority.' Too funny. I guess Americans are supposed to forget about the times the GOP used the filibuster, and that somehow 10 uses by the democrats is more noteworthy that than 200+ nominations they didn't contest. And the repugs here call liberals whiners...'tyranny of the majority' more like it. Just more of the Bush cronies 'reaching out' and 'uniting' I guess...