Incorruptible
Lifer
- Apr 27, 2012
- 10,086
- 58
- 86
Except Romney is a Mormon and Obama is not a Muslim.
Other than that, spot on analogy.
obama may not be Muslim but he sure loves to pander to them and go against Christians
Except Romney is a Mormon and Obama is not a Muslim.
Other than that, spot on analogy.
obama may not be Muslim but he sure loves to pander to them and go against Christians
obama may not be Muslim but he sure loves to pander to them and go against Christians
Nowhere in the Bible does it say you must tithe 10% of your gross income or you cannot get permission to enter a temple to perform secret Freemason rituals that allow you access to your own planet that you will rule over as a god with your celestial wife when you die.
Mormons are not Christians. Christians believe the way to salvation is through Jesus, not through the pocketbook.
It is the way one practices the religion that is different; the overall belief is stil the same.
I doubt many Christians would agree. There are some very huge differences between traditional Christianity and Mormonism.
There is a good reason Christians drove them from town to town as the ran west from civilization, ultimately Joseph Smith was murdered in jail by Christians.
obama may not be Muslim but he sure loves to pander to them and go against Christians
No, there really isn't. Biblical canon isn't agreed on. In light of the fact that "traditional Christianity" can't tell what's supposedly divinely inspired and what's made up, the Mormon claims about their books don't stick out.
Likewise with their saints.
If you want to list all of the Christians killed by other Christians, we're gonna be here a while.
Actually the canon of the new testament was pretty much set within the first few centuries of the christian church, and that is agreed upon by all christian churches.
No, there really isn't. Biblical canon isn't agreed on. In light of the fact that "traditional Christianity" can't tell what's supposedly divinely inspired and what's made up, the Mormon claims about their books don't stick out.
Likewise with their saints.
If you want to list all of the Christians killed by other Christians, we're gonna be here a while.
And the Mormons don't remove any of those. So you have no case.
Maybe so, but the swearing in on the Qu'ran vs. Book of Mormon analogy still doesn't hold water.
They aren't removing but they're certainly adding and that is just as bad, since they don't have the authority to do so.
They aren't removing but they're certainly adding and that is just as bad, since they don't have the authority to do so.
No doubt, but we are talking modern history in the US. If they are all just Christians and one big happy family
They have just as much authority as anyone else did.
I'm sorry but that is just false. Go back and read the new testament. Christ founded One church and gave that church the power to bind and loose. He also gave that church a promise that he would guide the church and that the gates of hell would not prevail against it.
Who's authority are they supposed to get in order to do so? Gods? LOL
Made up book is made up.
So, "guided" into 41,000 denominations?
Also, the gates of hell don't seem to have prevailed against Utah.
When he was sworn in as Governor of Massachusetts, he swore in on the Bible but he's not Christian.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/1/6/romney-sworn-in-as-mass-governor/
The problem with this statement is that the church existed before the bible did.
And My Little Pony existed before the wiki. Doesn't mean that brightly colored talking equines actually exist.
Romney's critics think he'll swear the oath on The Book of Mormon.
Romney's supporters think he'll swear the oath on the Bible.
Obama's critics think he'll swear the oath on the Koran.
Obama's supporters think he'll swear the oath on the Bible.
Bottom line: Critics of either Obama or Romney are complete idiots on the question of what will the oath be sworn on.