Your post is a waste of space!!
Obama has already said he has NO intentions of being a two term president!
Now Hilary...or another Democrat -- YES!! Hands down!!
I don't think there's a single candidate of significant strength to run against him. And, yes I do know it's early to make this predication but I'm curious as to how the forum feels.
We will see if that is the case in late 2011. Remember at this point in 2006 it was assumed that the nomination belonged to Hillary, Obama was just a guy that gave a good speech at the 2004 convention.
Who's going to beat him, Sarah Palin? She probably can't even tie her own shoes. I never thought I'd see someone challenge Bush for stupidity. I was wrong.
The election will be based on the state of the economy. If the economy is showing definite signs of improvement, Mr Obama wins. If the economy gets worse, Mr Obama might lose.
Yea, but the republicans don't even have "a guy" at this point. Who are considered the rising stars/ up & comers in the party currently?
People are assuming he will still be president in 2012.
People are assuming he will still be president in 2012.
Mitch Daniels, Tim Pawlenty, Chris Christie (not running), Scott Brown (not running), Bobby Jindal, Bob McDonell, and Haley Barbour jump to mind.Who are considered the rising stars/ up & comers in the party currently?
The election will be based on the state of the economy. If the economy is showing definite signs of improvement, Mr Obama wins. If the economy gets worse, Mr Obama might lose.
I have no clue, I am not a Republican. The ones that have caught my interest though are people like Mitch Daniels, Paul Ryan. and Allen West to name a few off the top of my head.
Is that a threat?
The problem for the republicans will be finding a candidate who can bridge the tea party/ mainstream divide. The only one theoretically capable of that out of those 3 is Paul Ryan, but he has a pretty thin record limited to failed legislation.
People are assuming he will still be president in 2012.
You seemingly make the same mistake as many others make regarding the Tea Party folks. They are not a monolithic block other than they all agree that they want to see fiscal sanity brought back into the Federal government along with respect and obedience to the Constitution. They purposely avoid the "social issues" which traditionally divide independents, evangelicals, conservatives, and libertarians.
Mitch Daniels, Tim Pawlenty, Chris Christie (not running), Scott Brown (not running), Bobby Jindal, Bob McDonell, and Haley Barbour jump to mind.
There are many things that could happen to a president.
He could have a heart attack.
He could resign.
He could be kick out of office.
He could be killed.
Only someone like yourself would think of that as a threat.
Those are just the politicos. Your forget people like David Patreaus or John Bolton. I'd pay good money to see a debate of Obama vs Bolton.
As to Obama, we need to look back to LBJ. When Eugene McCarthy came within 6-7 points of beating him in the '68 New Hampshire primary, LBJ understood his position and folded. Hillary has kept her nose clean in the state dept and after she resigns in the next year or so, she will make a run against him. For the Democrats, dropping a president whose ratings suck and has shown that he cannot do what he promised will make it easy to nominate Hillary.