Will million dollar salaries ever become the typical average income?

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
Considering many two income households can typically earn from $100,000 to $150,000 in todays economy.
And those families still struggle to make ends meet when you consider two car payments, a house payment, and raising two or more children. The cars most likely costing $30,000+ each, and the home $200,000 ups to $350,000 for a typical 3 or 4 bedroom with two car garage. An average family home.

I see the day coming when that typical two income family could easily earn around one million gross yearly, and still have a hard time making ends meet considering the cost of new housing and that huge family car for mom and the kids, and dads $30,000 car. Then add in the cost of a car for when the kid reaches 16 years, education costs, college savings, property taxes for that $300,000 home and that monthly mortgage payment.

A million dollar yearly income wouldn't seem like that much.
And could be typical with upper middle class families.

When you consider just 20 or 30 years ago the average family income for two wage earners was around 30 to 40 thousand a year, and considering mom probably earned half of what dad earned. Today mom easily earns the same as dad. And that $6000 car now costs $30,000, and the new home from $$50,000 to $350,000. Not to mention education costs and planning, plus current tax rates.
I'd guess within ten years, twenty years for sure, one million will be the typical gross wage for two income households. Companies won't be able to attract quality employees for less.
 

rcpratt

Lifer
Jul 2, 2009
10,433
110
116
This has got to be the stupidest shit that I have ever read.
 
Last edited:

Dr. Zaus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2008
11,764
347
126
to the title: yes
And those families still struggle to make ends meet
stupid.

People "struggle" as a function of how much they make to how much they spend. "living paycheck to paycheck" is a choice made by almost every family.
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
to the title: yes
stupid.

People "struggle" as a function of how much they make to how much they spend. "living paycheck to paycheck" is a choice made by almost every family.

"You're not really living if you have money left over..."

That's what my idiot friends say.
 

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,034
1
81
I'm sorry, but a family of four making $100k is most definitely not going to struggle. Shit, we could live extremely well on that, even in California.
 

Dr. Zaus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2008
11,764
347
126
"You're not really living if you have money left over..."

That's what my idiot friends say.

Time to find friends that will encourage you to actually live by having money instead of borrowing it.
 

Dr. Zaus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2008
11,764
347
126
Fixed that for you.

Just did the math; If we see (on average) the historic rate of 3% inflation. The 100k take-home-pay will be 1 million in take-home-pay in about 78 years.

What you fail to see is that as government debt expands the % of the economy that is public a similar % is deducted from the value of that which is private; thus limiting growth, production capacity and overall-inflation.

Further, our increases in productivity combined with our loss of population that will spend balances out to a net-outcome of lower costs for more things: thus, again, deflationary.

The price and cost of energy is going to go up as well; this means that as the base-unit of the economy goes up, employment and thus spending will fall: again, deflationary.

At the moment, the only thing keeping us from a deflationary spiral is super-cheep credit from the fed and insane government spending.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Considering many two income households can typically earn from $100,000 to $150,000 in todays economy.
And those families still struggle to make ends meet when you consider two car payments, a house payment, and raising two or more children. The cars most likely costing $30,000+ each, and the home $200,000 ups to $350,000 for a typical 3 or 4 bedroom with two car garage. An average family home.

I see the day coming when that typical two income family could easily earn around one million gross yearly, and still have a hard time making ends meet considering the cost of new housing and that huge family car for mom and the kids, and dads $30,000 car. Then add in the cost of a car for when the kid reaches 16 years, education costs, college savings, property taxes for that $300,000 home and that monthly mortgage payment.

A million dollar yearly income wouldn't seem like that much.
And could be typical with upper middle class families.

When you consider just 20 or 30 years ago the average family income for two wage earners was around 30 to 40 thousand a year, and considering mom probably earned half of what dad earned. Today mom easily earns the same as dad. And that $6000 car now costs $30,000, and the new home from $$50,000 to $350,000. Not to mention education costs and planning, plus current tax rates.
I'd guess within ten years, twenty years for sure, one million will be the typical gross wage for two income households. Companies won't be able to attract quality employees for less.

You are throwing out a lot of big numbers above as 'typical' and 'average' when they are not.

However, eventually barring any major shift in our politics/economic structure; $1,000,000 will be an average middle class salary probably within 40-50 years.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,541
920
126
Just did the math; If we see (on average) the historic rate of 3% inflation. The 100k take-home-pay will be 1 million in take-home-pay in about 78 years.

What you fail to see is that as government debt expands the % of the economy that is public a similar % is deducted from the value of that which is private; thus limiting growth, production capacity and overall-inflation.

Further, our increases in productivity combined with our loss of population that will spend balances out to a net-outcome of lower costs for more things: thus, again, deflationary.

The price and cost of energy is going to go up as well; this means that as the base-unit of the economy goes up, employment and thus spending will fall: again, deflationary.

Yet the cost of just about everything continues to increase... gasoline, eggs, milk, food, everything except the stuff they use to measure inflation.

At the moment, the only thing keeping us from a deflationary spiral is super-cheep credit from the fed and insane government spending.

I'm sure that will last forever.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Considering many two income households can typically earn from $100,000 to $150,000 in todays economy.
And those families still struggle to make ends meet when you consider two car payments, a house payment, and raising two or more children. The cars most likely costing $30,000+ each, and the home $200,000 ups to $350,000 for a typical 3 or 4 bedroom with two car garage. An average family home.

I see the day coming when that typical two income family could easily earn around one million gross yearly, and still have a hard time making ends meet considering the cost of new housing and that huge family car for mom and the kids, and dads $30,000 car. Then add in the cost of a car for when the kid reaches 16 years, education costs, college savings, property taxes for that $300,000 home and that monthly mortgage payment.

A million dollar yearly income wouldn't seem like that much.
And could be typical with upper middle class families.

When you consider just 20 or 30 years ago the average family income for two wage earners was around 30 to 40 thousand a year, and considering mom probably earned half of what dad earned. Today mom easily earns the same as dad. And that $6000 car now costs $30,000, and the new home from $$50,000 to $350,000. Not to mention education costs and planning, plus current tax rates.
I'd guess within ten years, twenty years for sure, one million will be the typical gross wage for two income households. Companies won't be able to attract quality employees for less.

Let's consider:

55% of the population earns less than $30,000/yr. 85% earns less than $50,000/yr. That means only 15% of the population is earning enough to be part of a $100,000/yr household. That's why it's such a lie to look at household numbers instead of individual. Sure, if things stayed the same for another two hundred years we might get close to the levels you're talking about, but not much sooner than that.

Average home prices are still around $150,000 in most places. The gender gap is still .77, no where close to equal. While car prices are amazingly high on average, it's still a cake walk to get a brand new car for $10,000-15,000.

In short, I see you inflating pretty much everything, which I think is why you came to original conclusion. For the bulk of America, $1,000,000 isn't an annual salary, it's 40 years of retirement.
 

Dr. Zaus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2008
11,764
347
126
I lol when people tell me a house shouldn't cost more than double your income. Haha, I'd need to be making at least $125,000 a year.

Your house-payment should be, at most 1/3rd of your take-home; preferable 1/4th.

Let's say your combined house-hold take-home 60k/y and you do a 30 year fixed @4%(15 preferable).

Then you could stretch the budget and spend 1/3rd of your take-home, after saving 10ish down and get a 450kish house.

Alternatively, if you do 1/4th at 15 years (a much smarter/more conservative go) then you could afford about a 220k home.

So, as-long as the house is somewhere between 3 to 6 times your annual take-home you should be OK @ 4%.

Bring that housing loan rate up to 6% and it splits out 190-360k and you need to be within 3 to 5 times your annual take-home.
Yet the cost of just about everything continues to increase... gasoline, eggs, milk, food, everything except the stuff they use to measure inflation.
There are some shins being played with the CPI, no doubt.
I'm sure that will last forever.
Make your argument; it's probably a concurrently valid argument.
 
Last edited: