Will Haswell and Ivy Bridge overclocking properties be similar?

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Fjodor2001, Apr 14, 2012.

  1. Fjodor2001

    Fjodor2001 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    I just wonder if it's likely that Haswell will have the same overclocking properties that Ivy Bridge has? After all they will both use the same 22 nm process, tri-gate transistors, etc?

    What do you think? :confused:
     
  2. SickBeast

    SickBeast Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2000
    Messages:
    14,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope not but probably.
     
  3. Don Karnage

    Don Karnage Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,865
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes. Same process
     
  4. joshhedge

    joshhedge Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2011
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    0
    Haswell is a Tock right? So even if it overclocks as much as Ivy Bridge the performance would be greater clock for clock.
     
  5. Concillian

    Concillian Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,717
    Likes Received:
    1
    Nobody knows. Haswell is ~a YEAR away.

    There are plenty of examples where a new stepping of an existing CPU comes out and it gains 10% or more OC margin.

    For all we know Ivy Bridge overclocking in 6 months won't be like Ivy Bridge overclocking now. Nobody can even pretend to know about Haswell.
     
  6. Fjodor2001

    Fjodor2001 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    But you can make an educated guess based on previous CPUs. I.e. based on previous experiences, does a Tock usually overclock about the same as the corresponding Tick that use the same manufacturing process?
     
  7. jpiniero

    jpiniero Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,375
    Likes Received:
    10
    I think there's a good chance that Haswell's overclocking will be worse. The new features, L4 and included VRM are only going to add more heat.
     
  8. Arzachel

    Arzachel Senior member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Short answer: No.

    Long answer: Hell no. The process is going to be more mature, die size is going to be different, the iGPU will take up a different amount of the die, memory on a silicon interposer could change cooling properties, not even mentioning the overhauled arch that could totaly change baseline clocks.
     
  9. bryanW1995

    bryanW1995 Lifer

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    11,098
    Likes Received:
    0
    Haswell should overclock more like SB than IVB. Based upon everything I've heard about IVB, that would be a good thing.
     
  10. gplnpsb

    gplnpsb Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    It varies. Conroe clocked significantly worse than Cedar Mill at 65nm, but it also brought substantial IPC improvements on a scale not seen since.

    At 45nm, the initial C0 revision of Nehalem clocked similarly to the C0/C1 Penryn and Penryn CPUs, but perhaps a little poorer than the E0 revisions of those chips. Nehalem's D0 stepping improved clocks to the point that they met or exceeded the capabilities of many E0 Penryns. Keep in mind that Nehalem's die size was 263 mm2, vs 107 mm2 for Wolfdale, the dual core Penryn. The combined area of the two Penryn dies used for quad core Yorkfield CPUs was still smaller than Nehalem. We never saw how well Havendale - the dual core Nehalem - clocked, as it was cancelled at the B-0 stepping.

    At 32nm, Sandy Bridge improved clock potential by about 500 MHz over the six core Westmere processor. (ie 4.2GHz to about 4.7 GHz)

    There is truly a multitude of factors that affect clock potential, so it really is impossible to say how Haswell will clock at this point.
     
  11. Concillian

    Concillian Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,717
    Likes Received:
    1
    Based on previous experiences, does a Tick usually clock worse than the previous Tock?

    I'm not sure past experience is really something to work from in this case. Fin-fet is a little bigger departure from the norm than your typical shrink or even architecture change.
     
  12. Fjodor2001

    Fjodor2001 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Comparing the jump from CedarMill->Conroe, to IvyBridge->Haswell is completely pointless.

    Conroe was a completely redesigned architecture leaving behind the old Netburst based architecture which was based on high clocks and high power consumption. It was a paradigm shift.

    The architechture change going from Ivy Bridge->Haswell is much more subtle. It is more fair to compare it to the Clarkdale->SandyBridge architechture change.

    But how does SandyBridge overclock compared to Clarkdale? I think that would be a better estimate of how Haswell will overclock compared to Ivy Bridge.
     
    #12 Fjodor2001, Apr 14, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2012
  13. IntelUser2000

    IntelUser2000 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,073
    Likes Received:
    5
    I doubt you will see the on package DRAM on desktop parts.

    VRM will lower power usage, and new architecture might lower it further. The real question with overclocking is how the integrated VRM will handle overclocking current.

    I don't think there's any architecture I can think of that was big of a change as going to/going away from Netburst. :)

    Ivy Bridge to Haswell will probably be like Penryn to Nehalem. That's even smaller core change, but big platform change.
     
  14. jpiniero

    jpiniero Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,375
    Likes Received:
    10
    System power usage, sure, but there's got to be a cost to the CPU for moving the VRM in there.

    It sure looks like Intel is moving to SoC for all of it's processors.
     
  15. Don Karnage

    Don Karnage Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,865
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not sure why everyone is so unhappy with ivy. Yes it runs hot when overclocked but the 3770 should be a multithreaded monster.

    Buy a 120 dollar rasa kit and a 3570K and be happy
     
  16. Edrick

    Edrick Golden Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    0
    By the time Haswell comes out, the 22nm (tri gate) process will be much more mature. All the kinks should be worked out by then.

    And until we start seeing ES leaks, we can only assume.
     
  17. Fjodor2001

    Fjodor2001 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Haswell will also add stuff that increases the amount of heat: L4 cache, much larger IGP, etc. So chances are it will overclock worse than Ivy Bridge. We'll see...
     
  18. Borealis7

    Borealis7 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,356
    Likes Received:
    2
    I asked my cousin about IVB, he was on the Sandy Bridge IGP team at Intel. He said that any node shrink ("ticks") would not be good for overclocking because of die area reduction and node not yet being mature enough (even though operating voltage decreases with each node) but rather offer bug fixes to existing architecture and slight tweaks to IPC in the range of 5-10 percent.
    However, "Tocks" will offer much more in terms of overclocking as the process matures. so Haswell may still be another step forward in terms of clockspeed.

    that being said, if he offers to get me a 3570k with intel's employee discount i will not say no...:)
     
  19. BallaTheFeared

    BallaTheFeared Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    8,128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Overclocking headroom isn't a kink though...

    I still plan to get one because I bought a $120 rasa kit like Don said, and added a 360 rad, and two full cover gpu blocks... Great value in that kit, one of the best things I bought.
     
  20. Tuna-Fish

    Tuna-Fish Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    3
    Processes are not typically the same from inception until EOL. Given how dramatically Intel's 22nm departs from earlier ones, I find it entirely believable that it will gain a lot from a year or so of tweaking and testing in volume production.

    Of course, this does not lead to miracles.
     
  21. Tuna-Fish

    Tuna-Fish Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    3
    I find it entirely believable that going from power distribution at 100A to one at 10A will net reduce power use on chip, even if the VRM losses are shifted on-chip.

    As IntelUser2000 said, the big question is how much safety margin Intel will give that on-chip VRM, and how much of it can be reclaimed for OC use.
     
  22. SickBeast

    SickBeast Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2000
    Messages:
    14,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    So say Haswell eeks out 500mhz more from the 22nm process. Will you guys be happy with 4.8-5.3ghz? I find it a little disappointing.
     
  23. BallaTheFeared

    BallaTheFeared Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    8,128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well since Hasell is a new uarch there is really no way to know what kind of clocks we'll see or if +/- what we're getting now will means anything.

    Don't get caught up on clock speeds.
     
  24. Tuna-Fish

    Tuna-Fish Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    3
    As a programmer, I am a lot more interested in the new instructions set extensions supported by Haswell than on improvements on legacy code. As far as I'm concerned, it could degrade performance on old apps and it would still be the best thing since sliced bread.
     
  25. Don Karnage

    Don Karnage Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,865
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why is everyone expecting Haswell to overclock better? Same process but an enhanced IGP and VRM's on Die. It'll probably overclock worse.

    If Haswell will add another 8-10% IPC i won't even care if it can hit 4.8Ghz
     
Loading...