Originally posted by: bR
www.arodslapsballs.com/
Originally posted by: murphy55d
Originally posted by: Storm
Originally posted by: murphy55d
I never understood this mentality. It's a team game. He's the best player in baseball (or at least top 3), whether he ever wins a World Series or not. Cal Ripken never won a world series, is he a loser?
Hell no but Cal Ripken has class...
You cant say that about A-Rod...
Yankees <--- fan
Plus that swipe against Arroyo in the playoffs was lame.
Also his imitation of Jeter during the playoffs was even lamer. When I mean imitation anyone else notice when they were on tv and Jeter applauded his teammates A-Rod would do the same.
So the issue then is not whether he's a "winner", it's if he's a jerk. Who the hell cares if he's a jerk? there are jerks in every profession. Some jerks are good at what they do.
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: murphy55d
I never understood this mentality. It's a team game. He's the best player in baseball (or at least top 3), whether he ever wins a World Series or not. Cal Ripken never won a world series, is he a loser?
Teams get better when Arod leaves. That's no coincidence. The same can not be said of Ripken. Ripken was a good guy. From what we've seen Arod is not. Etc. They're two completely different players.
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: murphy55d
I never understood this mentality. It's a team game. He's the best player in baseball (or at least top 3), whether he ever wins a World Series or not. Cal Ripken never won a world series, is he a loser?
Teams get better when Arod leaves. That's no coincidence. The same can not be said of Ripken. Ripken was a good guy. From what we've seen Arod is not. Etc. They're two completely different players.
teams get better when he leaves because he is worth a lot in a trade. is he one of the best players in the game? yes, is he worth what he is paid compared to what other baseball players are paid? no.
Originally posted by: bigj3347
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: murphy55d
I never understood this mentality. It's a team game. He's the best player in baseball (or at least top 3), whether he ever wins a World Series or not. Cal Ripken never won a world series, is he a loser?
Teams get better when Arod leaves. That's no coincidence. The same can not be said of Ripken. Ripken was a good guy. From what we've seen Arod is not. Etc. They're two completely different players.
teams get better when he leaves because he is worth a lot in a trade. is he one of the best players in the game? yes, is he worth what he is paid compared to what other baseball players are paid? no.
If he was worth so valuable, why did Texas try everything to get rid of him??
Originally posted by: bigj3347
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: murphy55d
I never understood this mentality. It's a team game. He's the best player in baseball (or at least top 3), whether he ever wins a World Series or not. Cal Ripken never won a world series, is he a loser?
Teams get better when Arod leaves. That's no coincidence. The same can not be said of Ripken. Ripken was a good guy. From what we've seen Arod is not. Etc. They're two completely different players.
teams get better when he leaves because he is worth a lot in a trade. is he one of the best players in the game? yes, is he worth what he is paid compared to what other baseball players are paid? no.
If he was so valuable, why did Texas try everything to get rid of him??
