No. Games like Fear will probably be a slideshow even at 640x480.will a radeon 9700 suffice this day and age?
Originally posted by: CalamitySymphony
I would have to disagree. The 9700 = 6600GT. No big gains here.
you'll do fine on 1024x768 on EVERY game.
A 6600GT is a lot faster than a 9700, especially in newer games with shaders.The 9700 = 6600GT.
That's just nonsense. Even 2004 games like Far Cry and Doom 3 will strain that card badly at that setting.you'll do fine on 1024x768 on EVERY game.
Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
Originally posted by: CalamitySymphony
I would have to disagree. The 9700 = 6600GT. No big gains here.
you'll do fine on 1024x768 on EVERY game.
what? where have you been? the 6600gt outperforms the 9800pro on every front.
wrong. Fear runs at 800x600 minimal settings, one or two at medium, without any stuttering. CoD2 in dx9 mode is unplayable thoughOriginally posted by: BFG10K
No. Games like Fear will probably be a slideshow even at 640x480.will a radeon 9700 suffice this day and age?
Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
Originally posted by: CalamitySymphony
I would have to disagree. The 9700 = 6600GT. No big gains here.
you'll do fine on 1024x768 on EVERY game.
what? where have you been? the 6600gt outperforms the 9800pro on every front.
Yes but 20-30% improvement is hardly worth paying $100 for. Stepping up from 9700/9800 series is worthy if you go to 6800GT/GS, X800XL, X800Pro.
Given that even those cards will soon be fairly old and slow (look at COD2 and FEAR benches and you'll already see them only sustaining decent frames at 1024x768 with AA/AF, then getting 6600GT from 9700 is defeating the purpose since it wont make your situation any better than 9700.
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
will a radeon 9700 suffice this day and age?
or do i need a 6600gt to play the latest games. like doom 3, for example.