Will a Q8300 last two more years?

dac7nco

Senior member
Jun 7, 2009
756
0
0
In 2010 I gave my Mom my retired office machine, with a Q8300, 8GB DDR2, GT240 and a 300GB WD Raptor. I've added a few things over the past few years (2x2TB storage, new fans and a bluray drive).

What she does is basic photo editing, cutting recorded audio using audacity, general internet use and Netflix. I'm going to install my Intel 80GB G2 SSD tomorrow (she uses Windows 7), and I figure it'll last a good long while... am I wrong? It was my final machine with a FSB. The motherboard is one of the ASUS corporate stable models; I'm wondering about performance over time, not things breaking.

Daimon
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,358
8,447
126
In 2010 I gave my Mom my retired office machine, with a Q8300, 8GB DDR2, GT240 and a 300GB WD Raptor. I've added a few things over the past few years (2x2TB storage, new fans and a bluray drive).

What she does is basic photo editing, cutting recorded audio using audacity, general internet use and Netflix. I'm going to install my Intel 80GB G2 SSD tomorrow (she uses Windows 7), and I figure it'll last a good long while... am I wrong? It was my final machine with a FSB. The motherboard is one of the ASUS corporate stable models; I'm wondering about performance over time, not things breaking.

Daimon

Probably. Software does tend to bloat over time but with a quad core and an ssd she should be good.
 

Sleepingforest

Platinum Member
Nov 18, 2012
2,375
0
76
Probably. Software does tend to bloat over time but with a quad core and an ssd she should be good.

Agreed with some reservations. It'll depend on if she gets newer versions of her software (as new versions tend to have more bloat, as said) and what speeds your mother believes to be "adequate."
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
18,669
5,395
136
If she's not going to use it for something she isn't already using it for, she will be fine.
 

dac7nco

Senior member
Jun 7, 2009
756
0
0
Cool. When I gave it to her she was on a 2.6GHz Northwood and a Geforce MX440; the difference was pretty stunning. Just browsing with a bunch of tabs open I can't tell much difference between her C2Q and my 3930K, but who knows what 2015 will bring.

Thanks All,
Daimon
 

OBLAMA2009

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2008
6,574
3
0
the real question is, if ivy bridge/haswell i5 quad core is only 150-170 at microcenter, why would you want to use q8300 for the next 2 years
 
Feb 25, 2011
16,907
1,551
126
the real question is, if ivy bridge/haswell i5 quad core is only 150-170 at microcenter, why would you want to use q8300 for the next 2 years

$150 + cost of motherboard, + cost of new RAM, + cost of other unsupported hardware replacement, if any.

$300 for a substantial upgrade is still a good deal. But $300 for an upgrade you won't actually notice? Less of a good deal.
 
Last edited:

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,142
5,089
136
In 2010 I gave my Mom my retired office machine, with a Q8300, 8GB DDR2, GT240 and a 300GB WD Raptor. I've added a few things over the past few years (2x2TB storage, new fans and a bluray drive).

What she does is basic photo editing, cutting recorded audio using audacity, general internet use and Netflix. I'm going to install my Intel 80GB G2 SSD tomorrow (she uses Windows 7), and I figure it'll last a good long while... am I wrong? It was my final machine with a FSB. The motherboard is one of the ASUS corporate stable models; I'm wondering about performance over time, not things breaking.

Daimon

Yes..it will be good for the next two years...unless you have a specific need that requires more oomph (gaming...transcoding etc etc ect)
 

dac7nco

Senior member
Jun 7, 2009
756
0
0
the real question is, if ivy bridge/haswell i5 quad core is only 150-170 at microcenter, why would you want to use q8300 for the next 2 years

It's not for me... It's for a moderate user. Also, the closest Microcenter to me was in San Jose, and it isn't there anymore. I still never drove 90 miles to save a hundred bucks on a CPU.

Daimon
 

jaqie

Platinum Member
Apr 6, 2008
2,471
1
0
Misleading title.

As for that being fast enough? if it is maintained and kept clean, it will be more than fast enough for a non heavygamer non poweruser for two more years, probably more like four to six.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,552
10,171
126
Lol at the idea that QUAD-CORE might not be "good enough" for general software in the next two years. Of course it will, don't worry about that.

The only "next big thing" coming up in the PC world (besides Thunderbolt), is 4K video and also H265. Both of which would likely be covered by a GPU upgrade, assuming future GPUs are PCI-E and they stay backwards-compatible.

If you do decide to upgrade, get her an i3 NUC, not a SB/IB quad-core.

Edit: There was some discussion about PC longevity and possible performance issues in my threads in the CPU and Overclocking sub-forum. Go there, and search for "10 year rig"
 
Last edited:

mindless1

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2001
8,359
1,555
126
In 2015 it'll still be twice the machine she needs, unless she starts getting into 3D gaming at which point a video card upgrade might be warranted.
 
Last edited:

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
11,897
2,716
136
CPUs do not "slow down", although software can become more resource-hungry. The real question is whether the cost of upgrading is worth the benefits, which is primarily getting tasks done more quickly. Other factors to consider includes relatively minor things such as lower power consumption, mobo features, etc.
 

mfenn

Elite Member
Jan 17, 2010
22,400
5
71
www.mfenn.com
Lol at the idea that QUAD-CORE might not be "good enough" for general software in the next two years. Of course it will, don't worry about that.

I think that the quad-core aspect doesn't matter nearly as much as the (fairly low) single-threaded performance. For example javascript is not very well multithreaded and the web is packed with increasingly more and more complex javascript.