WikiLeaks documentary worth watching

[DisgruntledVirus]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhTfOL9_HBE&feature=related <- first 1/4th of it which links to the other parts.

It might change some of your views on the "need" for a multinational group which can get out secret information. Also, it illustrates how they aren't just attacking the US as some would have you believe.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhTfOL9_HBE&feature=related <- first 1/4th of it which links to the other parts.

It might change some of your views on the "need" for a multinational group which can get out secret information. Also, it illustrates how they aren't just attacking the US as some would have you believe.

Is Michael Moore the director?

When you're done with this one, watch Zeitgeist and Fahrenheit911

 

[DisgruntledVirus]

Is Michael Moore the director?

When you're done with this one, watch Zeitgeist and Fahrenheit911

No, actually he isn't.

There is a difference between conspiracy theory videos and this.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

No, actually he isn't.

There is a difference between conspiracy theory videos and this.

There is? What is the difference between this video and Fahrenheit911?

I just thought that Moore was the director since he's been so far up Assanges arse for some time now.

 

[sandorski]

Interesting Documentary.

 

[DisgruntledVirus]

There is? What is the difference between this video and Fahrenheit911?

I just thought that Moore was the director since he's been so far up Assanges arse for some time now.

I misspoke earlier. I was incorrectly putting Fahrenheit 9/11 as the film that put forth that 9/11 was an inside job. My bad. Moving on though.

IMHO basically anything produced by Moore is akin to the Collateral Damage video WikiLeaks put out, where both are put out with a lot of bias. This documentary is in favor of WikiLeaks, but much more neutral and is more a chronology of WikiLeaks. I see a different between this and basically anything Moore puts out in that this is more just reporting instead of trying to guide a specific narrative. That's just my opinion though.

Either way, it's worth a watch. I found out some things I didn't know about, or contribute to, them (like about the Palin private emails during 2008 campaign, Iceland stuff, etc).

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

I misspoke earlier. I was incorrectly putting Fahrenheit 9/11 as the film that put forth that 9/11 was an inside job. My bad. Moving on though.

IMHO basically anything produced by Moore is akin to the Collateral Damage video WikiLeaks put out, where both are put out with a lot of bias. This documentary is in favor of WikiLeaks, but much more neutral and is more a chronology of WikiLeaks. I see a different between this and basically anything Moore puts out in that this is more just reporting instead of trying to guide a specific narrative. That's just my opinion though.

Either way, it's worth a watch. I found out some things I didn't know about, or contribute to, them (like about the Palin private emails during 2008 campaign, Iceland stuff, etc).

No worries, i've made the same mistake myself.

I'm very weary about most things when it comes to WikiLeaks because Assange and his followers treats it like the best thing known to mankind and he rules as a not so benevolent dictator (i assume those comments were removed because there have been interviews with people behind WikiLeaks that stated just that) so the chance of getting an unbiased view is close to zero.

 

[sandorski]

No worries, i've made the same mistake myself.

I'm very weary about most things when it comes to WikiLeaks because Assange and his followers treats it like the best thing known to mankind and he rules as a not so benevolent dictator (i assume those comments were removed because there have been interviews with people behind WikiLeaks that stated just that) so the chance of getting an unbiased view is close to zero.

that's part of this documentary.