• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wifi nuking your sperm!

Bulllllllllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiiiit. That's all it is. The electromagnetic radiation has no direct harmful effect. The only possible way it could is through heating. And, testicle temperature is sufficiently well regulated in men. (Of course, the heat from a laptop can raise the temperature, leading to slightly reduced fertility.)
 
The question is how important is this in the real world. its one thing to say a WIFI signal an inch away from a sperm sample may nuke the sperm. But if we increase the distance to a more realistic 24 inches, by the inverse square law, we are talking 1/576 the effect.
 
Good thing were moving through space and time right now and have electromagnetic fields around us at all times to keep out the ebil wifi death waves.
 
Bulllllllllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiiiit. That's all it is. The electromagnetic radiation has no direct harmful effect. The only possible way it could is through heating. And, testicle temperature is sufficiently well regulated in men. (Of course, the heat from a laptop can raise the temperature, leading to slightly reduced fertility.)

So how does my microwave oven actually work? :colbert:
 
What if you put a layer of aluminium foil between your lap and the laptop. That should reflect the radiation.
 
Bulllllllllllllllshiiiiiiiiiiiiit. That's all it is. The electromagnetic radiation has no direct harmful effect. The only possible way it could is through heating. And, testicle temperature is sufficiently well regulated in men. (Of course, the heat from a laptop can raise the temperature, leading to slightly reduced fertility.)

Well, apparently they compared to samples stored at the same temperature to control for heat.

That said, it was a study of 29 men and there was a 14% breakdown in the control versus a 25% breakdown in the sperm under a laptop. That isn't much of a sample size and even then I don't agree with the alarming conclusion. I think a more accurate statement based on this data is "Wifi use may have a small to negligible effect on sperm quality...after it leaves your balls".
 
Back
Top