Why you should password protect your wireless router....

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110424/ap_on_hi_te/us_wi_fi_warning

BUFFALO, N.Y. – Lying on his family room floor with assault weapons trained on him, shouts of "pedophile!" and "pornographer!" stinging like his fresh cuts and bruises, the Buffalo homeowner didn't need long to figure out the reason for the early morning wake-up call from a swarm of federal agents.

That new wireless router. He'd gotten fed up trying to set a password. Someone must have used his Internet connection, he thought.

"We know who you are! You downloaded thousands of images at 11:30 last night," the man's lawyer, Barry Covert, recounted the agents saying. They referred to a screen name, "Doldrum."

"No, I didn't," he insisted. "Somebody else could have but I didn't do anything like that."

"You're a creep ... just admit it," they said.

Law enforcement officials say the case is a cautionary tale. Their advice: Password-protect your wireless router.

Plenty of others would agree. The Sarasota, Fla. man, for example, who got a similar visit from the FBI last year after someone on a boat docked in a marina outside his building used a potato chip can as an antenna to boost his wireless signal and download an astounding 10 million images of child porn, or the North Syracuse, N.Y., man who in December 2009 opened his door to police who'd been following an electronic trail of illegal videos and images. The man's neighbor pleaded guilty April 12.

For two hours that March morning in Buffalo, agents tapped away at the homeowner's desktop computer, eventually taking it with them, along with his and his wife's iPads and iPhones.

Within three days, investigators determined the homeowner had been telling the truth: If someone was downloading child pornography through his wireless signal, it wasn't him. About a week later, agents arrested a 25-year-old neighbor and charged him with distribution of child pornography. The case is pending in federal court.

The poll conducted for the Wi-Fi Alliance, the industry group that promotes wireless technology standards, found that among 1,054 Americans age 18 and older, 32 percent acknowledged trying to access a Wi-Fi network that wasn't theirs
 

AlienCraft

Lifer
Nov 23, 2002
10,539
0
0
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110424/ap_on_hi_te/us_wi_fi_warning

BUFFALO, N.Y. – Lying on his family room floor with assault weapons trained on him, shouts of "pedophile!" and "pornographer!" stinging like his fresh cuts and bruises, the Buffalo homeowner didn't need long to figure out the reason for the early morning wake-up call from a swarm of federal agents.

That new wireless router. He'd gotten fed up trying to set a password. Someone must have used his Internet connection, he thought.

"We know who you are! You downloaded thousands of images at 11:30 last night," the man's lawyer, Barry Covert, recounted the agents saying. They referred to a screen name, "Doldrum."

"No, I didn't," he insisted. "Somebody else could have but I didn't do anything like that."

"You're a creep ... just admit it," they said.

Law enforcement officials say the case is a cautionary tale. Their advice: Password-protect your wireless router.

Plenty of others would agree. The Sarasota, Fla. man, for example, who got a similar visit from the FBI last year after someone on a boat docked in a marina outside his building used a potato chip can as an antenna to boost his wireless signal and download an astounding 10 million images of child porn, or the North Syracuse, N.Y., man who in December 2009 opened his door to police who'd been following an electronic trail of illegal videos and images. The man's neighbor pleaded guilty April 12.

For two hours that March morning in Buffalo, agents tapped away at the homeowner's desktop computer, eventually taking it with them, along with his and his wife's iPads and iPhones.

Within three days, investigators determined the homeowner had been telling the truth: If someone was downloading child pornography through his wireless signal, it wasn't him. About a week later, agents arrested a 25-year-old neighbor and charged him with distribution of child pornography. The case is pending in federal court.

The poll conducted for the Wi-Fi Alliance, the industry group that promotes wireless technology standards, found that among 1,054 Americans age 18 and older, 32 percent acknowledged trying to access a Wi-Fi network that wasn't theirs
<bathing in 1990's memories of Pringles cans & a child-like AWE OF tHE iNTARWEB.:wub::wub::wub:
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
There are many reasons to password protect your network. This is definitely one of those reasons.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
I finally password protected mine. After getting some notices that I was pirating shows that I'd never watch.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
I went with the highest strength encryption available. Seems foolish not to.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
I went with the highest strength encryption available. Seems foolish not to.
I had issues logging on when I first tried to set up a password. So I gave up.
Then I got a notice. Ignored it. Got another notice, ignored it. Got another notice, figured out how to set up password. No more notices.
 

Venix

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2002
1,084
3
81
Law enforcement officials say the case is a cautionary tale. Their advice: Password-protect your wireless router.

I have some advice for these "law enforcement officials." Suspects are innocent until proven guilty and these sacks of shit should start acting like it. There is absolutely no excuse for executing a violent paramilitary raid on someone suspected only of nonviolent computer crimes.
 

amdhunter

Lifer
May 19, 2003
23,332
249
106
This is why you shouldnt protect your wifi. Now when you do illegal stuff, you can blame the neighbors.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
I have some advice for these "law enforcement officials." Suspects are innocent until proven guilty and these sacks of shit should start acting like it. There is absolutely no excuse for executing a violent paramilitary raid on someone suspected only of nonviolent computer crimes.
QFT!
 

SKORPI0

Lifer
Jan 18, 2000
18,484
2,418
136
Scanned the neighborhood, looks like everyone is protected. Time to spoof someones MAC address. :sneaky:

wifiscan.jpg
 
Last edited:

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I have some advice for these "law enforcement officials." Suspects are innocent until proven guilty and these sacks of shit should start acting like it. There is absolutely no excuse for executing a violent paramilitary raid on someone suspected only of nonviolent computer crimes.

This. So much this I can't say enough this.

Fuck pigs. The whole lot of 'em. There's no such thing as a good pig.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
I got a new Dlink a month or so ago. Can't figure out how to password protect it, so I didn't. I live out in nowhere land, so my risk is low, I presume.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
I got a new Dlink a month or so ago. Can't figure out how to password protect it, so I didn't. I live out in nowhere land, so my risk is low, I presume.

hehe. I actually know of a couple that lived in a house up the mountain. They suddenly noticed a car parked on the road a few hours each day. They thought they were enjoying the view.
They were really borrowing the wireless.
 

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
Nope everyone should leave their routers open if they want to. This is a sign that judges need to be more prudent when handing out no-knock warrants, arrest warrants, and search warrants, and cops should be more prudent when executing them.
 
Last edited:

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,378
4,998
136
It is hard to believe people cannot figure out how to set wireless security and a password / phrase.

Wow.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Scanned the neighborhood, looks like everyone is protected. Time to spoof someones MAC address. :sneaky:

wifiscan.jpg

MAC spoofing doesn't crack WPA encryption. No one should be using WEP.

If they use NO encryption and only have only a list of allowed MAC IDs, that's practically no security. I've accessed those WITHOUT spoofing a MAC (just use manual IP settings instead of DHCP).
 
Last edited:

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
WPA and a pre-shared-key (give to family, friends, and guests).

That's the best balance of compatibility / security.

...and change the SSID so your computer isn't confused and connecting to your neighbor's wireless.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
It is hard to believe people cannot figure out how to set wireless security and a password / phrase.

Wow.
Many people can't figure out how to set the clock on a microwave.

Perhaps that "Clock" button might be slightly relevant...:hmm:
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,124
779
126
Generalize much?
It an over simplification, but...
I would bet everything I have that you know police officers that have no business being police officers. That is assuming you believe the motto "Protect and Serve".

Generally, I like police. I've worked with the Highway Patrol for over twenty years. I have friends that are cops. I know cops that are good people. I know cops that just want to fuck with people.
But deep down inside, I have little to no trust in them. Unless they prove trust worthy.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
Plenty of others would agree. The Sarasota, Fla. man, for example, who got a similar visit from the FBI last year after someone on a boat docked in a marina outside his building used a potato chip can as an antenna to boost his wireless signal and download an astounding 10 million images of child porn,
How the fuck is that even possible? I wouldn't be able to download that much REAL porn unless it was running for maybe 2 years straight.

And where is it coming from? Like why would some weird porn collection be larger and faster to download than real porn? This no sense makes.