Why would ANYONE take a long distance train??

Josh

Lifer
Mar 20, 2000
10,917
0
0
I am travelling to North Carolina in about a little over a week. I travel there usually once a month and I always fly for around $200-$250...this time I was thinking about taking a train to save some money and because I am travelling with somebody who doesn't really want to spend money a plane ticket. However, while doing research I see that it is around $150 for a train ticket. Why would someone not splurge the extra $50 and save about 13 hours in travelling time??? I just don't understand how trains are still in business, i mean for the obvious fact that some are afraid to fly..but other than that...you don't even get a bedroom with that money - that will run you an extra $275!! Makes no sense to me...
 

episodic

Lifer
Feb 7, 2004
11,088
2
81
I've traveled on trains in Europe - and it was a much more relaxed experience than trying to hop a plane.
Much less stressful.

 

QED

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2005
3,428
3
0
The newer Amtrak trains are much more comfortable than flying on most airlines-- even flying first class.

So you are really trading time for comfort... if I wasn't in a big rush, I'd probably take the train over flying-- much more comfortable and overall less hassle.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Do you have to take off your shoes and leave all liquids behinds to ride a train these days? If not, you get back a couple of those hours just from skipping the security fun.
 

deadlyapp

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2004
6,671
744
126
i take a train from school to home. San Luis Obispo, CA to Tacoma, WA. 27 hours scheduled, last trip was 40+ hours after hitting a guy, stopping multiple times for downed tracks, losing power a few times, and having to have conductors bussed to us from 4+ hours away.

That was a sh!tty train.
 

Josh

Lifer
Mar 20, 2000
10,917
0
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Do you have to take off your shoes and leave all liquids behinds to ride a train these days? If not, you get back a couple of those hours just from skipping the security fun.

I suppose....

Hmmm anyone have a recent picture of inside a AmTrak train? I just can't imagine sitting in a seat for 13 hours...yea i know they have a dining car and all that...but still.. I feel like the only way I'd do it was if I had the bedroom but its like $300 for that.
 

Sukhoi

Elite Member
Dec 5, 1999
15,350
106
106
Originally posted by: Josh
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Do you have to take off your shoes and leave all liquids behinds to ride a train these days? If not, you get back a couple of those hours just from skipping the security fun.

I suppose....

Hmmm anyone have a recent picture of inside a AmTrak train? I just can't imagine sitting in a seat for 13 hours...yea i know they have a dining car and all that...but still.. I feel like the only way I'd do it was if I had the bedroom but its like $300 for that.

I could see it being fun if traveling in a group where you had your own party going on, but alone it must be hell.
 

Josh

Lifer
Mar 20, 2000
10,917
0
0
Originally posted by: Sukhoi
Originally posted by: Josh
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Do you have to take off your shoes and leave all liquids behinds to ride a train these days? If not, you get back a couple of those hours just from skipping the security fun.

I suppose....

Hmmm anyone have a recent picture of inside a AmTrak train? I just can't imagine sitting in a seat for 13 hours...yea i know they have a dining car and all that...but still.. I feel like the only way I'd do it was if I had the bedroom but its like $300 for that.

I could see it being fun if traveling in a group where you had your own party going on, but alone it must be hell.

I'd be with the girlfriend. That's why we were thinking bedroom...:Q but too expensive
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Originally posted by: sm8000
Europe knows how to do train travel right.



To be fair, most train travel for Europeans involves covering a good deal less ground that indicated by the OP. Travelling by high speed rail from Paris to Marseille is a lot diff than going from Biloxi to New York.
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
Meh, I like the train.


Granted, I only took it from Raleigh to Charlotte, but it was a fairly pleasant experience and much cheaper than flying from Raleigh to Charlotte.
 

Josh

Lifer
Mar 20, 2000
10,917
0
0
Originally posted by: TheWart
Originally posted by: sm8000
Europe knows how to do train travel right.



To be fair, most train travel for Europeans involves covering a good deal less ground that indicated by the OP. Travelling by high speed rail from Paris to Marseille is a lot diff than going from Biloxi to New York.

Yea, i just went to the Amtrak website and for 2 adults travelling roundtrip for a bedroom from Newark to Charlotte, NC it is $815 !!?? Sheesh. Forget that.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: TheWart
Originally posted by: sm8000
Europe knows how to do train travel right.



To be fair, most train travel for Europeans involves covering a good deal less ground that indicated by the OP. Travelling by high speed rail from Paris to Marseille is a lot diff than going from Biloxi to New York.

yeah, keep in mine that france is a nice rectangular country that is smaller than texas all by itself. much smaller distances = less time in the train
 

Josh

Lifer
Mar 20, 2000
10,917
0
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TheWart
Originally posted by: sm8000
Europe knows how to do train travel right.



To be fair, most train travel for Europeans involves covering a good deal less ground that indicated by the OP. Travelling by high speed rail from Paris to Marseille is a lot diff than going from Biloxi to New York.

yeah, keep in mine that france is a nice rectangular country that is smaller than texas all by itself. much smaller distances = less time in the train

Seems a hella lot cheaper too...
 

tm37

Lifer
Jan 24, 2001
12,436
1
0
Some people are afraid to fly.

(I know one of these people and he takes the train)
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
It's the experience. I took a 14 hour (one-way, each way) train trip in '05 and (except for the fact that I discovered I can't sleep well on trains) it really is a great experience. An almost completely stress-free way to travel and see the scenery.