Here are the (slight) differences listed between the CSA Constitution and the U.S. one: http://www.filibustercartoons.com/CSA.htm
Even though I wish the CSA had won, because the Union was the aggressor, I think the CSA kind of deserved to lose for two reasons. First, it was stupid as shit to invade Gettysburg, and the 2nd, because they didn't base their government on the Articles of Confederation, even though they wanted states' rights and were opposed to taxation and even though their victory would've been secured if they had fought like the Revolutionaries did (i.e., decentralized, guerilla warfare, and not invading the enemy's territory).
All in all, the CSA Constitution was only marginally better. It still sucked though.
The thing I don't get away with is how the CSA gets away with having the name it does, because it's not confederate. That's ultimately the so-called CSA's biggest crime (other than being intellectually dishonest about states' rights).
Even though I wish the CSA had won, because the Union was the aggressor, I think the CSA kind of deserved to lose for two reasons. First, it was stupid as shit to invade Gettysburg, and the 2nd, because they didn't base their government on the Articles of Confederation, even though they wanted states' rights and were opposed to taxation and even though their victory would've been secured if they had fought like the Revolutionaries did (i.e., decentralized, guerilla warfare, and not invading the enemy's territory).
All in all, the CSA Constitution was only marginally better. It still sucked though.
The thing I don't get away with is how the CSA gets away with having the name it does, because it's not confederate. That's ultimately the so-called CSA's biggest crime (other than being intellectually dishonest about states' rights).