Londo_Jowo
Lifer
You're free to do whatever you choose to do, just be ready to pay the consequence if you violate the law or someone else's rights/freedom.
You're free to do whatever you choose to do, just be ready to pay the consequence if you violate the law or someone else's rights/freedom.
Great argument.
It just can't work. Can you think of any successful governments based on anarchy?
Contradictory of terms there. An anarchist "government" could not possibly exist. You can't have a ruling body and yet not have one at the same time.
I think you meant an anarchist society. If thats what you meant then I cant think of one that's ever been tried. Can you?
You see how thick the blindness is? You do not even know you are advocating what you are warning me not to do. But again the excuse, at least for you, is that you do as you're told, not what is right. The dissociation of responsibility is strong with you.
Exactly. Anarchy is internally inconsistent (contradicts itself). I'm glad we're in agreement on this.
No I think you don't understand the terms. I suggest you read them and find out what they mean.
Let me guess, you're an only child who always got their way by holding their breath and stomping their feet who is now extremely frustrated that it doesn't work in the real world.
link?
You can do your own homework. Would you care to explain how Anarchy contradicts itself?
I'm willing to trade. Otherwise, you can do your own homework, imo. You don't have the authority to compel me to disclose.
You made the claim that anarchy contradicts itself. The burden of proof is on you.
I reject any would be burdens imposed upon me by you trying to dictate norms of reasoned discourse, due to it being dangerous. That kind of organizational mandate undermines my freedoms as an individual. Why should i submit to consensus, community evidentiary standards regarding the making of claims?
Look, people do things. It's a fact.
Name one "government" that didn't subdue its people. China is a republic and we know how well that's working out for those who intend to be free. The fact is it doesn't matter which type of "government" is instituted we always end up enslaved due to the belief that a select few have the "right" to rule. Doesn't matter whether it be socialist, democratic, republic, communist or a combination of all, the very fact there is a ruling class means that good people will be "law abiding" and cause harm to others and attribute their actions to the state. Disassociating themselves from responsibility and morality. That's why the belief in "authority" is so dangerous.
Kee-rist. Government will exist and has always existed since ancient times, with democratic republics just being the best of what there is.
If you were enslaved or in danger of it, you dolt, you wouldn't be posting fatuous tripe on an internet forum, bet on that.
Anarchy would be Darwinism. The weak would perish, and the unprepared. It would only last until the most powerful took control for themselves to protect those they cared for and exploit those who they do not. And then you would have feudalism.
Anarchy is for mentally lazy dreamers.
Reading this thread makes me think I'm in bizarro world right now...
Seriously, threads on this experiment (that was your reason for posting?) come up couple times every year. It's been discussed. There's nothing new to talk about.
Reading this thread makes me think I'm in bizarro world right now...
Seriously, threads on this experiment (that was your reason for posting?) come up couple times every year. It's been discussed. There's nothing new to talk about.
You just can't handle the truth man....
......They may even express discomfort in "following orders", protest that its "not right" but the majority of people, a staggering and quite frightening 2/3's of "law abiding citizens", continue their torture or murder at the behest of the "authority figure"