I heard that Obama (supposedly) said he couldn't wait to stick it to whitey if elected.Originally posted by: Dari
But all this is ironic because she's not doing interviews and she (supposedly) called Obama a "sambo" and Clinton a "bitch".
Originally posted by: Dari
Since Obama started his Presidential campaign, she hasn't had him on (she wants to be impartial because she supports him). There is word (from Drudge) that Oprah's people were arguing about having her on. Oprah denies any of this ever happened.
But all this is ironic because she's not doing interviews and she (supposedly) called Obama a "sambo" and Clinton a "bitch".
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Dari
Since Obama started his Presidential campaign, she hasn't had him on (she wants to be impartial because she supports him). There is word (from Drudge) that Oprah's people were arguing about having her on. Oprah denies any of this ever happened.
But all this is ironic because she's not doing interviews and she (supposedly) called Obama a "sambo" and Clinton a "bitch".
The word you're looking for is "allegedly."
Oprah to Palin: I Can Pencil You In Later
Posted Sep 5th 2008 1:41PM by TMZ Staff
Oprah has issued a statement to TMZ -- she won't put Sarah Palin on her show until after the election.
Here's the statement: "The item in today's Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show. At the beginning of this Presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over."
For the record, Barack Obama has been on "Oprah" twice -- in January, 2005 and again in October, 2006 -- before he announced his run for Prez.
Originally posted by: deftron
You still aren't explaining why
it's such a big deal that Oprah doens't want her
since she isnt' going on anyones show
Originally posted by: Farang
I find it funny that ABC News ran a story alleging that Oprah is biased. Of course she is biased.. she endorsed one of the candidates. This might be a story if she was having Obama on a few times before the election, but she endorsed him, had him on once, and has now taken the stance of someone stepping out of politics altogether. To say that she has any obligation to have Palin on (who isn't giving interviews anyways) is ridiculous.
Originally posted by: deftron
You still aren't explaining why
it's such a big deal that Oprah doens't want her
since she isnt' going on anyones show
Interesting logic...Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think it works like this:
1. Oprah is a very open supporter of Obama.
2. Oprah has a show that caters to women.
3. Palin IS a woman.
4. This Oprah should have Palin on her show because she is a woman and to give the appearance of balance.
Not sure I buy the argument since Obama hasn't been on the show in a year or so.
But I think Oprah could have a very good show by having Palin on to talk about her life and how she got to where she is without getting real heavy into the politics of it all.
Originally posted by: her209
Interesting logic...Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think it works like this:
1. Oprah is a very open supporter of Obama.
2. Oprah has a show that caters to women.
3. Palin IS a woman.
4. This Oprah should have Palin on her show because she is a woman and to give the appearance of balance.
Not sure I buy the argument since Obama hasn't been on the show in a year or so.
But I think Oprah could have a very good show by having Palin on to talk about her life and how she got to where she is without getting real heavy into the politics of it all.
#2 is irrelevant. #4 is an illogical statement.Originally posted by: zeruty
Nice selective bolding. You missed an important line. See aboveOriginally posted by: her209
Interesting logic...Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think it works like this:
1. Oprah is a very open supporter of Obama.
2. Oprah has a show that caters to women.
3. Palin IS a woman.
4. This Oprah should have Palin on her show because she is a woman and to give the appearance of balance.
Not sure I buy the argument since Obama hasn't been on the show in a year or so.
But I think Oprah could have a very good show by having Palin on to talk about her life and how she got to where she is without getting real heavy into the politics of it all.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I heard that Obama (supposedly) said he couldn't wait to stick it to whitey if elected.Originally posted by: Dari
But all this is ironic because she's not doing interviews and she (supposedly) called Obama a "sambo" and Clinton a "bitch".
