Why not AMD 761/766 motherboards?

Odeen

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2000
4,892
0
76
All 761-based boards have those crappy 686B Via southbridges... With their IDE hard drive-killing and Sound Blaster Live-locking features, that is. AMD has their own part available (The 766 south bridge), yet not a single board uses it..

I don't know about you, but I'd pay $185 or so for an Asus with 761/766 chipset combination, 3 or 4 DDR DIMM slots, 3-phase power regulation with nice big heatsinks, a POST reader (like the Epox 761-based board), 6 PCI slots, and no secondary IDE controllers to create problems.

Or $300-$320 for the same board with a built-in Adaptec 7899 chip for U160 SCSI.

As it stands, I should be getting an Epox in an hour or so.. can't go _too_ wrong for $128 + S&H.
 

Odeen

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2000
4,892
0
76
It's the best thing possible, and the only IDE device in this box is a Kenwood 72X, which is ATA-33. I also don't have an SB Live.

However, what I _am_ saying is that if such a board becomes available, I'll cut someone a sweet deal on that EPoX and buy that board.. Incidentally, the only drawback of SCSI is the cost - the drives are built like tanks, the 7200 RPM SCSI units easily beat the best 7200 RPM IDE units, and the latest drives are _very_ quiet and run rather cool. But, this is the wrong board to discuss SCSI..
 

Mungla

Senior member
Dec 23, 2000
843
0
71
"With their IDE hard drive-killing"

What do you mean by this? The Epox could have been improved by using a Promise controller and not the Highpoint.
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
The reason they don't use AMD's southbridge is simple...it is much more expensive.
 

Odeen

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2000
4,892
0
76
Yes, but if it's _reliable_ and stable, I'd be willing to pay extra. I think I'm not alone in this, too.