- Mar 18, 2007
- 11,959
- 157
- 106
I have this strange feeling the addon developer will keep saying NoScript 10 is coming but keep pushing back the release day. 
He had best not. NoScript is the jelly to uBlock Origin's peanut butter (and Firefox is the buttermilk bread!), so FF57 can't be complete without it.
He had best not. NoScript is the jelly to uBlock Origin's peanut butter (and Firefox is the buttermilk bread!), so FF57 can't be complete without it.
At least as far as Chrome ad blocking goes, the browser itself is not as amenable to ad blocking extensions. So the versions of uBlock and such for Chrome aren't at feature parity with their Firefox counterparts, especially as FF devs are willing to ad additional API hooks to improve ad blockers.For me, Chromium is the day-old bread. (Fresh Chrome is available for the same price with value card!) ScriptSafe is the jelly. And AdBlock is the cheap peanut butter I haven't found a better replacement for. (I see there is uBlock Origin for Chrome. Maybe I'll try it later.)
What don't make sense is, Mozzila made a big article about this very extension, and the migration process, then they leave the dev of the extension hanging by not fixing the required API calls that he needs.I have this strange feeling the addon developer will keep saying NoScript 10 is coming but keep pushing back the release day.![]()
NoScript 10 is very different from 5.x: some things are simpler, some things are improved, some are still missing and need to wait for WebExtensions APIs not available yet in Firefox 57. Anyway, whenever you decide to migrate, your old settings are kept safe, ready to be used as soon as the feature they apply to gets deployed.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/versions/Looks like I was right and I was hoping I was not.
Correct. NoScript 10 is out.Hmm, NoScript just popped up an icon on Firefox Nightly? I guess that the new version is out?