Why isn't "receivement" a word?

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Instead of saying, "Payment was received on 1/16/2009", you can say, "Receivement was on 1/16/2009."
 

brblx

Diamond Member
Mar 23, 2009
5,499
2
0
i just don't see how this proposed new word would make it less ambiguous?
 

AreaCode707

Lifer
Sep 21, 2001
18,447
133
106
Because technically the correct word in that context would be "receipt" but few people use it in that form nowadays.

Receipt was on 1/16/2009
Receipt on 1/16/2009, more concisely

Alternatively you could say Received on 1/16/2009.

No need for a made up word.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/receipt
3 : the act or process of receiving
 

brblx

Diamond Member
Mar 23, 2009
5,499
2
0
Fail. Payment is a noun, Received is an adjective. Receivement would also be a noun.

lol, how does that matter at all?

also received in this context would be a past tense verb. the implied subject recieved the payment. it's not describing the payment.
 

Mike Gayner

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2007
6,175
3
0
lol, how does that matter at all?

also received in this context would be a past tense verb. the implied subject recieved the payment. it's not describing the payment.

Because nouns and adjectives aren't interchangeable. Your suggestion would be ambiguous and difficult to understand. Don't drop English quite yet, genius.
 

Sumguy

Golden Member
Jun 2, 2007
1,409
0
0
Scanned thread, didn't see this.

The word you are looking for is receipt

Edit: whoops, scan failed, even used the same source
 
Last edited:

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
71,961
32,144
136
I'm entitled to a receivement! From this point forward, when I remember to do so, I shall endeavor to slip the term receivement into my writing here on ATOT.

Eventually our good friends the business majors will realize that Receivements takes up less header space on their spreadsheets than 'Accounts Receivable'.
 

AreaCode707

Lifer
Sep 21, 2001
18,447
133
106
Because nouns and adjectives aren't interchangeable. Your suggestion would be ambiguous and difficult to understand. Don't drop English quite yet, genius.

While you are correct, language use changes over time. The word 'receipt' has fallen out of favor and the word 'received' has taken its' place in common use.
 

brblx

Diamond Member
Mar 23, 2009
5,499
2
0
Because nouns and adjectives aren't interchangeable. Your suggestion would be ambiguous and difficult to understand. Don't drop English quite yet, genius.

i think you need to go back to english and learn more definitions. :rolleyes:

'you are full of idiocy' and 'you are idiotic' would both describe you adequately, despite being different parts of speech.
 

Sumguy

Golden Member
Jun 2, 2007
1,409
0
0
Thats not the reason.
Wont is a contraction for will & not. And its a word.

You'd prefer "willn't" or "win't" then?

Actually it probably could have started off as "win't" and shifted to "won't" after a few generations based on how people heard and pronounced it.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Received is the word you're looking for. Receivement makes no sense.
 
Oct 20, 2005
10,978
44
91
You can achieve something which becomes an achievement.

You can receive something but it's not a receivement.

That's a good question OP, since achieve/achievement works, why not receivement?
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,080
136
You'd prefer "willn't" or "win't" then?

Actually it probably could have started off as "win't" and shifted to "won't" after a few generations based on how people heard and pronounced it.

If we had grown up with Willnt it would seem natural. But wont always seems weird.