Instead of saying, "Payment was received on 1/16/2009", you can say, "Receivement was on 1/16/2009."
But its ambiguous, maybe "Received payment on 1/16/2009".'recieved on 1/16/2009,' there, professor.
'received on 1/16/2009,' there, professor.
"Paid on 1/16/2009" :awe:'received on 1/16/2009,' there, professor.
Fail. Payment is a noun, Received is an adjective. Receivement would also be a noun.
lol, how does that matter at all?
also received in this context would be a past tense verb. the implied subject recieved the payment. it's not describing the payment.
Because nouns and adjectives aren't interchangeable. Your suggestion would be ambiguous and difficult to understand. Don't drop English quite yet, genius.
Because nouns and adjectives aren't interchangeable. Your suggestion would be ambiguous and difficult to understand. Don't drop English quite yet, genius.
Because it sounds retarded
Thats not the reason.
Wont is a contraction for will & not. And its a word.
Thats not the reason.
Wont is a contraction for will & not. And its a word.
Fail. Payment is a noun, Received is an adjective. Receivement would also be a noun.
You'd prefer "willn't" or "win't" then?
Actually it probably could have started off as "win't" and shifted to "won't" after a few generations based on how people heard and pronounced it.