- Oct 28, 1999
- 62,484
- 8,345
- 126
Okay, my company "leased" a workgroup printer back in May. The total cost of the printer was ~$15,000. We did a 48 month lease on the machine with a dollar buyout at the end for total possesion of the machine at the end of the lease. My monthly lease payments are $378 a month. The total cost of the machine over the span of the 48 months is ~$18144.
Here is the problem. The machine sucks. It's slow. It's unreliable, and it doesn't work as advertised. Some of it is due to the machine being a lemon, but a majority of it is just a terrible design on behalf of the machine itself. I want to be completely rid of the machine.
The manufacturer of the machine will give me a new one, which really doesn't solve anything since the printer itself has problems that will not be corrected. My reseller agrees on me with this. Soooooo, my only other option is to try and get out of my lease and sell off/relocate the printer to a place that is a better fit for it.
Too bad the leasing company are being complete dicks.
According to them, for me to get out of the lease, I need to pay a buyout fee of $16,000 and THEY get to keep the printer. WTF??? I've already paid out $2300 on the machine, and my total cost is $18,144. If I want to pay off the lease, and I get to keep the machine, it will cost me $24,000....$6,000 MORE than what it would be if I had stretched the total payments out over the span of the 48 months.
Can somebody please explain to me what the problem is with just making one lump payment of ((42 * $378) + $1) . They aren't loosing any money at all. That $378 is constant. It does not change. In my mind, they are actually getting a better deal. They get their full payment, in one shot, plus interest, minus the financial risk involved with stretching a lease over 48 months. The machine would have been mine in the end anyway, where's the holdup?
Is there something besides the fact that that leases are COMPLETELY in favor of the leasor instead of the leasee that I am missing? I don't see how they would be loosing any money by paying off the full amount + interest early.
*sigh*

Here is the problem. The machine sucks. It's slow. It's unreliable, and it doesn't work as advertised. Some of it is due to the machine being a lemon, but a majority of it is just a terrible design on behalf of the machine itself. I want to be completely rid of the machine.
The manufacturer of the machine will give me a new one, which really doesn't solve anything since the printer itself has problems that will not be corrected. My reseller agrees on me with this. Soooooo, my only other option is to try and get out of my lease and sell off/relocate the printer to a place that is a better fit for it.
Too bad the leasing company are being complete dicks.
According to them, for me to get out of the lease, I need to pay a buyout fee of $16,000 and THEY get to keep the printer. WTF??? I've already paid out $2300 on the machine, and my total cost is $18,144. If I want to pay off the lease, and I get to keep the machine, it will cost me $24,000....$6,000 MORE than what it would be if I had stretched the total payments out over the span of the 48 months.
Can somebody please explain to me what the problem is with just making one lump payment of ((42 * $378) + $1) . They aren't loosing any money at all. That $378 is constant. It does not change. In my mind, they are actually getting a better deal. They get their full payment, in one shot, plus interest, minus the financial risk involved with stretching a lease over 48 months. The machine would have been mine in the end anyway, where's the holdup?
Is there something besides the fact that that leases are COMPLETELY in favor of the leasor instead of the leasee that I am missing? I don't see how they would be loosing any money by paying off the full amount + interest early.
*sigh*