Why is their no blood in BF2?

[fatty4ksu]

Lame

 

[imported_LoKe]

Is there one of those Gore Mode on/off options?

 

[jelkukipik]

Because its ...

 

[thechinesehero]

Originally posted by: jelkukipik
Because its ...

hi nik.

 

[HardcoreRobot]

becuase they did not use the software forum

 

[Mrvile]

Because T.

 

[rickn]

Originally posted by: Mrvile
Because T.

even T rating would allow some blood

 

[randumb]

does it really matter?

 

[lobadobadingdong]

I prefer it that way. Since graphics are getting better, there really is no need for fake splatterings of blood.

 

[fatty4ksu]

Graphics=nutin special

 

[Mrvile]

Originally posted by: rickn

Originally posted by: Mrvile
Because T.

even T rating would allow some blood

Not if the graphics are good enough.

 

[rickn]

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: rickn

Originally posted by: Mrvile
Because T.

even T rating would allow some blood

Not if the graphics are good enough.

graphics quality has nothing to do with ESRB rating. T rating still allows for some blood.

 

[Mrvile]

Originally posted by: rickn

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: rickn

Originally posted by: Mrvile
Because T.

even T rating would allow some blood

Not if the graphics are good enough.

graphics quality has nothing to do with ESRB rating. T rating still allows for some blood.

Alright, take Killer Instinct. Tons of blood, rated T. Now imagine that game with today's graphics. Still get a T rating? I dunno...:disgust:

 

[dug777]

WE WANT BLOOD!!1!!!!11!!

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Originally posted by: Mrvile
Alright, take Killer Instinct. Tons of blood, rated T. Now imagine that game with today's graphics. Still get a T rating? I dunno...:disgust:

That's because it's an older game; the rules apparently change. For example, Marathon 2: Durandal was a very gory game released back in 1995 on the Macintosh. It got a Mature rating. The PC version was released a little over a year later with the same amount of blood and gore and got a Teen rating.

EDIT: Besides, just read the ESRB website. It says right there that minimal blood is allowed.

 

[Mrvile]

Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: rickn

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: rickn

Originally posted by: Mrvile
Because T.

even T rating would allow some blood

Not if the graphics are good enough.

graphics quality has nothing to do with ESRB rating. T rating still allows for some blood.

Alright, take Killer Instinct. Tons of blood, rated T. Now imagine that game with today's graphics. Still get a T rating? I dunno...:disgust:

That's because it's an older game; the rules apparently change. For example, Marathon 2: Durandal was a very gory game released back in 1995 on the Macintosh. It got a Mature rating. The PC version was released a little over a year later with the same amount of blood and gore and got a Teen rating.

... I don't know what you're saying. Are you contradicting me or what?

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
That's because it's an older game; the rules apparently change. For example, Marathon 2: Durandal was a very gory game released back in 1995 on the Macintosh. It got a Mature rating. The PC version was released a little over a year later with the same amount of blood and gore and got a Teen rating.

... I don't know what you're saying. Are you contradicting me or what?

You were saying that games today must get a Mature rating if they are too gory (which contradicts the official ESRB site) and said that insane amounts of blood was acceptable for a Teen rating back then, which isn't right because Marathon 2 got two different ratings.

 

[KoolDrew]

Because EA is crap.

 

[piddlefoot]

yep we want blood , we want it realistic , and even more so when 64 bit coding comes we want maps that can be totally destroted.....

 

[Yossarian]

because the modern battlefield is bloodless.

 

[Supermanowar]

Yeah, it's probably EA. They know they can sell it to more kids as a T game because of lame places like Wal-Mart. Way to go, Wal-Mart, I hate you.

 

[Mrvile]

Originally posted by: Supermanowar
Yeah, it's probably EA. They know they can sell it to more kids as a T game because of lame places like Wal-Mart. Way to go, Wal-Mart, I hate you.

What about Sims 2? It's only got a T but you can do a lot of...weird...things...

 

[aplefka]

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: Supermanowar
Yeah, it's probably EA. They know they can sell it to more kids as a T game because of lame places like Wal-Mart. Way to go, Wal-Mart, I hate you.

What about Sims 2? It's only got a T but you can do a lot of...weird...things...

Wanna Woo Hoo?

 

[Supermanowar]

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: Supermanowar
Yeah, it's probably EA. They know they can sell it to more kids as a T game because of lame places like Wal-Mart. Way to go, Wal-Mart, I hate you.

What about Sims 2? It's only got a T but you can do a lot of...weird...things...

EA doesn't give the games ratings, the ESRB does. If there was something in The Sims 2 that would give it an M rating, EA would Maxis take it out. EA is huge and evil.

 

[Mrvile]

Originally posted by: Supermanowar

Originally posted by: Mrvile

Originally posted by: Supermanowar
Yeah, it's probably EA. They know they can sell it to more kids as a T game because of lame places like Wal-Mart. Way to go, Wal-Mart, I hate you.

What about Sims 2? It's only got a T but you can do a lot of...weird...things...

EA doesn't give the games ratings, the ESRB does. If there was something in The Sims 2 that would give it an M rating, EA would Maxis take it out. EA is huge and evil.

There's nothing in the game itself that would directly earn an M rating...but you can upload skins and whatnot. At least you could in the original Sims that made the game a bit more...interesting to play