Why is the Clinton "Non profit" Foundation not under investigation.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
And the Republicans here never do that do they?

Ive been here a long time and one personal observation that i have made over the years is that Republicans on this board are far more willing to be critical of a republican politician than the resident democrats towards democrat politician.

The Clinton have been involved in scandal after scandal before, during and after Bill became POTUS. and yet there is STILL democrat forum members asking for proof of this.

either they are brain dead or just being dumbass trolls.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Ive been here a long time and one personal observation that i have made over the years is that Republicans on this board are far more willing to be critical of a republican politician than the resident democrats towards democrat politician.

The Clinton have been involved in scandal after scandal before, during and after Bill became POTUS. and yet there is STILL democrat forum members asking for proof of this.

either they are brain dead or just being dumbass trolls.

Please, I've been here two years less than you and for a scandal to be a real scandal there must be proof, not merely allegations. Bill womanizing with legal aged women is not that important to me. As far as republicans being critical of their own, I've seen very little of that on this board. They're still defending Bush going into Iraq.

edit: If Bill were running around spouting family values bs, then I'd agree he's a hypocrite and a sleaze.
 
Last edited:

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
The entire point is there are many indications of wrong doing with Hillary and Bill, but if it isn't investigated Nothing will be found out nor will any guilt or innocence be found.

You asking for proof of wrong doing is a BS dodge of the question Why isn't anything being investigated.

Don't even waste your time. He's just an ignorant troll.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Please, I've been here two years less than you and for a scandal to be a real scandal there must be proof, not merely allegations. Bill womanizing with legal aged women is not that important to me. As far as republicans being critical of their own, I've seen very little of that on this board. They're still defending Bush going into Iraq.

OK. How about the private flights he was on with a convicted pedophile who forced minor girls to perform sex acts? What about staying on the pedophile's private island where these underage girls were forced to do the sexual acts?

No reason to investigate that either?
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
OK. How about the private flights he was on with a convicted pedophile who forced minor girls to perform sex acts? What about staying on the pedophile's private island where these underage girls were forced to do the sexual acts?

No reason to investigate that either?

Knock yourself out, investigate all you want, when you have some proof, get back to me and I'll admit he's a sleaze.

edit: what about all the republicans hanging with Josh Duggar, an admitted child molestor? No reason to investigate them?
 
Last edited:

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Knock yourself out, investigate all you want, when you have some proof, get back to me and I'll admit he's a sleaze.

edit: what about all the republicans hanging with Josh Duggar, an admitted child molestor? No reason to investigate them?

Lets leave that thread in that thread. You and I both know it would ruin this perfectly go...well this decent....ok screw it.

If a republican or democrat were friends with Josh when that was going on and if they were in the same place as him when it was happening? Yes. But this is how many years later?

Clinton flew on the private jet with the pedo. That is a fact. Clinton stayed on the private island. That is a fact. The pedo had girls forced to do sexual acts on the plan and on the island. That is a fact. Whether Clinton was on the plane or the island at the time of the acts is what needs to be investigated.

I did see a pretty damning document that had Bill on the plane multiple times while a hooker was on there.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Lets leave that thread in that thread. You and I both know it would ruin this perfectly go...well this decent....ok screw it.

If a republican or democrat were friends with Josh when that was going on and if they were in the same place as him when it was happening? Yes. But this is how many years later?

Clinton flew on the private jet with the pedo. That is a fact. Clinton stayed on the private island. That is a fact. The pedo had girls forced to do sexual acts on the plan and on the island. That is a fact. Whether Clinton was on the plane or the island at the time of the acts is what needs to be investigated.

I did see a pretty damning document that had Bill on the plane multiple times while a hooker was on there.

Again, Bill womanizing with legal aged women doesn't bother me as he doesn't spout bs about family values.

Link to this pedo and proof that he had underage girls forced to do sex acts on the plane, I've never heard of it.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,316
16,686
136
Maybe I missed it, but I saw no proof about underage girls forced to do sex acts on the plane, nor any proof of underage girls being on the plane with Clinton.

His name was on the log for christs sake! The log! What more proof do you need? In a court of law that would have lead to a conviction 100% of the time! Everyone knows that when someone's name is in the log it clearly means they are guilty of so many crimes! That's just criminology 101!



/s
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Maybe I missed it, but I saw no proof about underage girls forced to do sex acts on the plane, nor any proof of underage girls being on the plane with Clinton.

edit: And why would that be grounds to investigate the Clinton Foundation?

Which is why I said it should be investigated. ?!?!?!??!?!?!

It wouldn't be grounds to investigate the Clinton Foundation. Unless Clinton Foundation funds were use to pay for any part of the trips. Were any Clinton Foundation funds used to pay for any part of the trips?

This is the slippery slope of being a "public servant", while collecting money for your private "charity", while your spouse personally collects funds from places your position can influence, while your spouse vacations and pals around with convicted felons.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Which is why I said it should be investigated. ?!?!?!??!?!?!

It wouldn't be grounds to investigate the Clinton Foundation. Unless Clinton Foundation funds were use to pay for any part of the trips. Were any Clinton Foundation funds used to pay for any part of the trips?

This is the slippery slope of being a "public servant", while collecting money for your private "charity", while your spouse personally collects funds from places your position can influence, while your spouse vacations and pals around with convicted felons.

Title of thread: Why is the Clinton "Non profit" Foundation not under investigation.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Who's going to pay for these investigations? The RNC has plenty of money, write them with your concerns.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
OK. How about the private flights he was on with a convicted pedophile who forced minor girls to perform sex acts? What about staying on the pedophile's private island where these underage girls were forced to do the sexual acts?

No reason to investigate that either?

What about a link to a reliable source?

Not likely. Looks like desperate shit flinging from here.

Righties yearn for the good old days of Whitewater, when Ken Starr played the media for years only to come up with nada.

It was a completely shameless exercise in slime spreading, something they seem to enjoy tremendously. Well, just so long as their idols remain pristine.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,201
4,921
136
I'm guessing it's because the federal government is conspiring to cover up Clinton's misdeeds and all the people with proof don't want to come forward because they are afraid clinton will have them killed. Sure they could go on tv and announce to the world all the proof they have but as we all know, the media is controlled by the left and will never air something like that. They could and probably already have gone on fox to tell their story but as you know, everyone but Fox News watchers are duped by the lame stream media and big government supporters. And the circle completes!

Did I get it right? Did I miss anything?






The really sad and fucked up part, is that people like pcgeek see nothing wrong with what I posted and they don't think it's crazy at all.

I just wonder what they tell themselves when repubs had all three branches of government and they still never got anything on clinton, in fact, did they even bring all these supposed misdeeds up back then? I wonder why these conspiracies only pop up when hillary is running for office? Hmm...I can't think of a single reason, oh well.

No, the really Sad and Fucked up part is putting words into everyone's statements that they didn't say as you did above. You are one sad little man. So you feel that there is nothing to be investigated, no little red flags or even a hint of something not right? If that is what you mean, you are obviously a shill.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136

It's the same moralistic conspiracy theory rehash about the uranium business.

Oh, God! Russians! Uranium! Mushroom clouds!

It's just a commodity like any other. Fuel for reactors. I doubt they'd get nearly so twisted over gold mining.

Both Russia & the US have huge stockpiles of much more useful weapons grade plutonium stashed away as a result of partial nuclear disarmament.

And it's not like the State Dept was the only agency to OK the deal, either.

It's just something to prevent idle minds among the faithful, give them something to think about & a way to think about it rather than thinking for themselves. Can't have that.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,316
16,686
136
Yes you fucking hack! Let's investigate! What would you like to investigate? Accusations? Conspiracy theories? Hearsay?

I'm pretty sure you are a pedophile because you are a pcgeek and a lot of computer nerds molest children. Now that's worthy of investigating isn't it? The accusation has now been made, you are either all for investigating your child molesting behavior or you are guilty of molesting children. Right?

That's your logic you stupid fuck!


I await your response that will clearly indicate to us just how retarded you are and how, for the second time, you miss the fucking point.





No, the really Sad and Fucked up part is putting words into everyone's statements that they didn't say as you did above. You are one sad little man. So you feel that there is nothing to be investigated, no little red flags or even a hint of something not right? If that is what you mean, you are obviously a shill.