Why is the Clinton "Non profit" Foundation not under investigation.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Although I think foundations like this can do a lot of good, the moniker 'non-profit' usually means that they have figured out inventive ways of using 'profits.'
Pretty much this.

There may yet be but remember whose name is on the foundation. Nobody looks out for their own like government. The game afoot now is to put off, delay and obstruct until mid-November of next year. And don't think for one moment the Republicans aren't A-OK with it. Nobody in D.C. wants to see dirty laundry aired because they know they could be next. Nobody wants to see precedent of this nature set.
And this. Tons of people have not-for-profit foundations which exist solely for their own benefit, and none of these people want such foundations under a microscope.

^ self hate in full effect
Self hate or self medication? :D
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,974
140
106
It's a money laundering racket designed to benefit the clintons under the guise of "charity".
 

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,797
572
126
For the same reason no president really gets investigated.... after the pardon of President Nixon by his successor.


....
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
As compared to... Ted Cruz? Scott Walker? Rick Perry? The rest of the clown car?

Get a grip, buckaroo. It's not like she needs to defend the failed ideology of the Right- the job loss, the economic instability, the futile trumped up wars or massive inequality.

No need to remind them their GODS have clay feet. They can only see GODS where we see gold plated turds on thrones.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
There seems to be quite a bit of shadiness with that foundation. Yet no audits, no IRS investigation, no FBI investigation.

There are lots of red flags but it seems even the media is not interested much either.

And put ten thousand other dubious "Non Profit" foundations under investigation?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
And put ten thousand other dubious "Non Profit" foundations under investigation?

Absolutely not, certainly not the ones I linked back on page 1. The IRS just poking around the edges of that conglomeration of nested lies is what set off the whole right wing scandal about the IRS. That's real money laundering.

They just want to investigate their enemies, not their benefactors.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Mrs. Clinton should be vetted as a possible candidate for the office of the President of the United States.

I'm pretty sure she'll fail, as she has been in the public spotlight too long.

But then I was astounded when the residents of New York voted for her.

She is a ridiculously bad Presidential Candidate, in my opinion.

-John
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
Mrs. Clinton should be vetted as a possible candidate for the office of the President of the United States.

I'm pretty sure she'll fail, as she has been in the public spotlight too long.

But then I was astounded when the residents of New York voted for her.

She is a ridiculously bad Presidential Candidate, in my opinion.

-John

It seems she is the best candidate the Democrats can find, not a good sign.

We got Jeb Bush as the best candidate the Republicans can find, and Clinton.

We are going in the direction of the Ottoman Turks, if this is the best we can put forward.

Funny thing is people here frothing at the mouth defending her scam history.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,521
17,025
136
It seems she is the best candidate the Democrats can find, not a good sign.

We got Jeb Bush as the best candidate the Republicans can find, and Clinton.

We are going in the direction of the Ottoman Turks, if this is the best we can put forward.

Funny thing is people here frothing at the mouth defending her scam history.

"Scam history" based on what exactly? Conspiracy theories? Accusations? No ones defending anything, we are just calling you out on your bullshit claims.

Did you have something to back up your claims other than accusations, conspiracy theories, and hearsay?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
"Scam history" based on what exactly? Conspiracy theories? Accusations? No ones defending anything, we are just calling you out on your bullshit claims.

Did you have something to back up your claims other than accusations, conspiracy theories, and hearsay?

Well, no, but it's what he wants to believe, so he does.

Most people see that as a bug, but for right wing propagandists it's a feature.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
Such as?

Come on, actually put something forward. Put some effort into things.

Why dont you google. She has a long history. It does not take to much work to read up on some of the stuff going on.

What I find amazing is that you think she really has your interests in mind and your jumping to her defense.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
It seems she is the best candidate the Democrats can find, not a good sign.

We got Jeb Bush as the best candidate the Republicans can find, and Clinton.

We are going in the direction of the Ottoman Turks, if this is the best we can put forward.

Funny thing is people here frothing at the mouth defending her scam history.

It's not the best we can put forward, it's the best the rich who control the Country/elections will allow to be put forward.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Why dont you google. She has a long history. It does not take to much work to read up on some of the stuff going on.

What I find amazing is that you think she really has your interests in mind and your jumping to her defense.

Google can't come up with any convictions that I can find...Nor any real proof, just lots of allegations.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
The Democrats in here are like a cult. They support their fucked up leadership at all cost. it's quite sad.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,175
9,161
136
Why dont you google. She has a long history. It does not take to much work to read up on some of the stuff going on.

What I find amazing is that you think she really has your interests in mind and your jumping to her defense.
How about you just throw out some bones that we can go and google, since you're aware of...stuff...already.
The Democrats in here are like a cult. They support their fucked up leadership at all cost. it's quite sad.
Yes, Democrats in here are like a cult. Unlike the Republicans, who clearly aren't like a cult, because that's your team.

Keep on keepin' on.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
There seems to be quite a bit of shadiness with that foundation. Yet no audits, no IRS investigation, no FBI investigation.

There are lots of red flags but it seems even the media is not interested much either.
Because they are not guilty of anything??
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,521
17,025
136
Why dont you google. She has a long history. It does not take to much work to read up on some of the stuff going on.

What I find amazing is that you think she really has your interests in mind and your jumping to her defense.


Nice! When asked for examples and or proof you ask us to do the work for you, you then wrap up your post with a nice little straw man.

You righty retards are so predictable.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,521
17,025
136
The Democrats in here are like a cult. They support their fucked up leadership at all cost. it's quite sad.

So to you, support now means asking someone to backup their bullshit claims? Well excuse me if I don't gobble from the cock of right wing propaganda like you;)
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,350
4,973
136
The entire point is there are many indications of wrong doing with Hillary and Bill, but if it isn't investigated Nothing will be found out nor will any guilt or innocence be found.

You asking for proof of wrong doing is a BS dodge of the question Why isn't anything being investigated.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,521
17,025
136
The entire point is there are many indications of wrong doing with Hillary and Bill, but if it isn't investigated Nothing will be found out nor will any guilt or innocence be found.

You asking for proof of wrong doing is a BS dodge of the question Why isn't anything being investigated.

I'm guessing it's because the federal government is conspiring to cover up Clinton's misdeeds and all the people with proof don't want to come forward because they are afraid clinton will have them killed. Sure they could go on tv and announce to the world all the proof they have but as we all know, the media is controlled by the left and will never air something like that. They could and probably already have gone on fox to tell their story but as you know, everyone but Fox News watchers are duped by the lame stream media and big government supporters. And the circle completes!

Did I get it right? Did I miss anything?






The really sad and fucked up part, is that people like pcgeek see nothing wrong with what I posted and they don't think it's crazy at all.

I just wonder what they tell themselves when repubs had all three branches of government and they still never got anything on clinton, in fact, did they even bring all these supposed misdeeds up back then? I wonder why these conspiracies only pop up when hillary is running for office? Hmm...I can't think of a single reason, oh well.