Why is Temple Run so popular?

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
At one point it was the top grossing item in the App Store. It spawned the spinoffs Temple Run: Brave, Temple Run: Oz, and even a Temple Run arcade game.

Now there's definitely a runner craze with major game developers releasing titles in that genre, but Temple Run wasn't even the first runner game to be release for mobile. It doesn't have much depth, and it doesn't even have good graphics. Why does everyone love it so much?
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
The latest game like this is Minion Rush (ala Despicable Me), it's pretty good. I certainly wouldn't waste money buying the extras though.
 

Via

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2009
4,670
4
0
It's the perfect phone game. Imo playing it on a tablet is unwieldy.

I still play from time to time, hoping to break that 10,000,000 mark one day.
 

Staples

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2001
4,953
119
106
The real question is, does touch gaming appeal to anyone who grew up playing with a controller? I don't think I will ever like touch screen gaming.

The best game I have every played was a tower defense game for Android but you are just placing turrets and it isn't like most typical touch screen games.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Welcome to the casual mainstream.

These are people who would not have bought a NES in the 80s.

Normally I'd say they are irrelevant but they are responsible for devs mutilating real games, our games, to appeal to these casuals to take their $1, and ruining our beloved franchises in the process.
 
Last edited:

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
At one point it was the top grossing item in the App Store. It spawned the spinoffs Temple Run: Brave, Temple Run: Oz, and even a Temple Run arcade game.

Now there's definitely a runner craze with major game developers releasing titles in that genre, but Temple Run wasn't even the first runner game to be release for mobile. It doesn't have much depth, and it doesn't even have good graphics. Why does everyone love it so much?

The same could be said of most of American pop society.

People are just vacuous and enjoy wasting time.
 

Via

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2009
4,670
4
0
I think everyone should waste a few minutes here and there. It makes life better.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
67
91
Why do people play Angry Birds? They must be having fun.

The human psychy (spelling?) enjoys games that use parabolic paths. If you make a game with wierd physics, people don't like it.

1) Parabolic physics.
2) Gaming sessions can last 30 second or 30 minutes (think bathroom)
3) There is a puzzle solving aspect to it (granted very simple)
4) good production value
5) new levels come out periodically

It's not hard to understand the why.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
The real question is, does touch gaming appeal to anyone who grew up playing with a controller? I don't think I will ever like touch screen gaming.

The best game I have every played was a tower defense game for Android but you are just placing turrets and it isn't like most typical touch screen games.

I think so, but games have to be envisioned differently. Look at Bejeweled Blitz. Yes, it isn't exactly an in depth "hardcore" game, but it uses the touch screen perfectly.

It is not the players who grew up using controllers that are the problem; it is the developers who grew up using them that is. Emulating a controller on a touch screen is bad. It will never be intuitive or work (same with Motion IMO). You have to make something without using that limitation. You don't want to just do something a controller can do. They need to abandon the "alternative to pressing up on the joystick" and "alternative to pressing a or b".

The first person that comes up with that should patent that idea and license it; because it will be huge.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
I think so, but games have to be envisioned differently. Look at Bejeweled Blitz. Yes, it isn't exactly an in depth "hardcore" game, but it uses the touch screen perfectly.

It is not the players who grew up using controllers that are the problem; it is the developers who grew up using them that is. Emulating a controller on a touch screen is bad. It will never be intuitive or work (same with Motion IMO). You have to make something without using that limitation. You don't want to just do something a controller can do. They need to abandon the "alternative to pressing up on the joystick" and "alternative to pressing a or b".

The first person that comes up with that should patent that idea and license it; because it will be huge.

This.

Zelda Phantom Hourglass is a perfect example of a traditional controller game done perfect exclusively via touch screen.

Granted a stylus is far more forgiving than fingers.
 

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
The human psychy (spelling?) enjoys games that use parabolic paths. If you make a game with wierd physics, people don't like it.

1) Parabolic physics.
2) Gaming sessions can last 30 second or 30 minutes (think bathroom)
3) There is a puzzle solving aspect to it (granted very simple)
4) good production value
5) new levels come out periodically

It's not hard to understand the why.

Psyche.

WRT 1) the parabolic bit is the only part where Angry Birds engages its tenuous link to reality.
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
I've only played temple run for about 4 minutes and absolutely hated every second of it.

On the other hand in the last month I've probably sunk 40 hours into Hayday. Am I proud of myself? No. But damn seriously that is a catchy game.
 

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
The latest game like this is Minion Rush (ala Despicable Me), it's pretty good. I certainly wouldn't waste money buying the extras though.

Even though that's a higher quality game with a bigger budget, it'll still never achieve Temple Run's success. Personally, I can't see how Temple Run was an innovator.
 

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
Angry Birds was one of the first major phone games, so there wasn't much competition.
It has good artwork. (Temple Run doesn't have that)
You can blow things up, which provides short-term accessibility.
There are hundreds of levels to provide long-term enjoyment. (Temple Run doesn't have that)

They're both accessible, but I don't see how Temple Run was such a hit.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
Temple Run is popular because it's a game you can play on the can. It's really that simple. People like mindless entertainment.