I read the following article and got a little upset.
Story on Big Ben
That was a pretty cold article...while Ben didn't play well, he still had a great season, the Steelers vastly outperformed expectation in part to Ben's very good season and, in the end, the Steelers lost to a superior team (I picked the Pats to win by 14).
I can accept Phil Sims or Boomer or Marino or some other 'good' ex-pro commentator sticking it to an NFL player...but some fat slob who couldn't run forty yards even if he was chasing a krispy kreme truck, probably can't throw a football any better than my grandmother, etc. should measure his words more carefully IMO.
Out of all the possible people ESPN.com could get to write football column's they pick Pasquarelli...why!?
Couldn't they find someone who actually played football well in college or the pro's to write a decent segment? Sheesh.
Oh...and the answer is 42.
Story on Big Ben
That was a pretty cold article...while Ben didn't play well, he still had a great season, the Steelers vastly outperformed expectation in part to Ben's very good season and, in the end, the Steelers lost to a superior team (I picked the Pats to win by 14).
I can accept Phil Sims or Boomer or Marino or some other 'good' ex-pro commentator sticking it to an NFL player...but some fat slob who couldn't run forty yards even if he was chasing a krispy kreme truck, probably can't throw a football any better than my grandmother, etc. should measure his words more carefully IMO.
Out of all the possible people ESPN.com could get to write football column's they pick Pasquarelli...why!?
Couldn't they find someone who actually played football well in college or the pro's to write a decent segment? Sheesh.
Oh...and the answer is 42.
