- Oct 16, 2006
- 1,651
- 473
- 136
Now with all the outrage over the 2 part review of Trinity, this should be off the charts.
The difference of course being that AMD simply split their product review, while inetl flat out controlled the benchmarks on theirs.
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/10/02/a-year-on-ultrabooks-are-a-worse-disaster-than-most-expected/
We apologise for the fault in the subtitles. Those responsible have been sacked.
-ViRGE
Every time, there was a new excuse. Eventually they started insisting that we run specific OSes, run specific tests, and only do the things that they proposed or they would not supply us one. If we deviated at all, either in testing or writing, we would miss out on the wonders of Ultrabooks. We told them to get bent again. After about a dozen rounds of this, SemiAccurate gave up, but Intel is still more than happy to supply any site willing to give the category good reviews with as many as needed, prototypes, upcoming concept hardware, and anything else they need. If you hinted at an honest review however, you got lied to.
The difference of course being that AMD simply split their product review, while inetl flat out controlled the benchmarks on theirs.
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/10/02/a-year-on-ultrabooks-are-a-worse-disaster-than-most-expected/
We apologise for the fault in the subtitles. Those responsible have been sacked.
-ViRGE
Last edited by a moderator:
