Because it has some legitimate medical reasons to have it done. So pre-emptively having it done for a child could be beneficial.
what are they?
what are they?
I'm cut... I'm Jewish. I got my son cut religiously. If the religion is true... my son is part of the Jewish people, and is in line with the commandments and so forth. If the religion is not true.. there are no adverse effects. And either way he's more likely to get laid more, get more BJs and it's easier to clean thereby less likely to get infections and so on.
What's the downside?
Masturbation is a sin, and since circumcision helps reduce masturbation rates, then circumcision must be good.
Go read up on John Harvey Kellogg sometime, and his opinions on human sexuality, its kinda sickening.
Besides studies showing being cut contributes to sexual dysfunction later in life, cut men take longer to get aroused, and stay aroused less then uncut, its more difficult for cut men to stay aroused while wearing a condom,,,,,,,.
Yes, you should care. While your having to take viagra later in life, I'll be tapping that butty without the help of drugs.
There absolutely are downsides. The scar is one clear downside, it's so common that the circumcision scar on the penis is usually seen as normal, but it isn't, obviously. Due to the scarring skin tags and skin tunnels are very common, and while they don't often cause any medical problems, they can be aesthetically displeasing to the owner. In addition, there are some sexual dysfunctions; one of the purposes of the foreskin is for protection of the glans, without it, the glands is subject to more wear and tear and can become somewhat keratinized or hardened thus reducing its sensitivity. Also, a common side effect of circumcision is partial and sometimes complete inadvertent resection of the frenulum which is one of the most sensitive parts of the penis; again reducing overall sensitivity.
Are these make or break downsides? Nope. Most circumcised men don't even realize they have these "problems" as they've never known any different. Most circumcised men lead a completely normal sexual satisfying life, it just may have been more satisfying had they not had a circumcision. It's one of those "you can't miss what you never had" issues.
Easier to clean... adheres to religion. More Blow jobs.
invalid assumption
invalid assumption
invalid conclusion
Fail.
Argument not found.
Appropriate retort.
Uh-huh!
Some people can't have sex due to a tight foreskin, in order to fix that they need a circumcision, it happens to 1% of men.
wouldn't this be the equivalent of pulling all your teeth after the first cavity.....you know just in case?
Some people can't have sex due to a tight foreskin, in order to fix that they need a circumcision, it happens to 1% of men.
Hey I'm not saying do it, I'm just saying there are legitimate medical reasons for having a circumcision, whether or not to pre-emptively have it done to a child is up to the parent.
Hold on a second let me look....
Nope no unsightly scar, or skin tags, or skin tunnels...
Rubbing on the glands...
feels good. Sexual functions seem to be in order.
Remembering last night with my wife...
Blow job was solid... sexual experience excellent.
Nope I don't see any evidence of the downsides you're talking about. I suppose I should thank god for inventing underwear to protect my glands?
Maybe we should remove babies colon's at birth too. Lot of men get colon cancer later in life.
Women should have their breasts lopped off to because that would resolve breast cancer issues as well.
exactly .... argument not found. assumptions followed by an unrelated conclusion isn't any kind of argument.
Assumption one: It is easier to clean an Uncircumcised penis
Assumption two: If a penis is easier to clean, it will be more likely to be cleaned
Assumption two: Cleaner penises are less likely to get infected
Conclusion: Circumcised penises are less likely to be infected than uncircumcised penises
Assumption one: Women prefer to suck on circumcised penises
Assumption two: Women suck on penises they prefer more often than penises they don't
Conclusion: An uncircumcised penis is more likely to be sucked on by a woman.
Assumption one: Jewish law demands that the male son be circumcised when they are 8 days old
Assumption two: Following Jewish law and the commandments is considered to be a good thing according to Judaism
Conclusion: Circumcising your male son at 8 days old is considered a good thing according to judaism.
Assumption one: I have absolutely no discernible negative effects of having been circumcised myself
Assumption two: I am experiencing the benefits of the above mentioned arguments.
Conclusion: I can get my son circumcised if I fucking want to and you need to mind your own damn business. If you don't want to circumcise your son.... then don't. Don't bother me with your groundless baseless drivel.
Fuck you very much
Any questions?
In the developed world we have a cream that can help that...
Maybe we should remove babies colon's at birth too. Lot of men get colon cancer later in life.
Women should have their breasts lopped off to because that would resolve breast cancer issues as well.
There that's better. This is a good argument for the 13.3 million Jews on the planet. However it doesn't apply to the other 5.99 billion non-jews.You need to go relearn what a logical argument is.
Allow me to re-state my logical argument.
Fact one: Jewish law demands that the male son be circumcised when they are 8 days old
Fact two: Following Jewish law and the commandments is considered to be a good thing according to Judaism
Conclusion: Circumcising your male son at 8 days old is considered a good thing according to judaism.
. Don't bother me with your groundless baseless drivel.
It would be easier to clean female external genitalia if all her labia were resected, should it be done? (I mean, really, there are an infinite amount of analogies that could be made here)
No we don't.
Can you even have your colon removed with few side effects
