Why is a hairy back considered "disgusting" ?

yobarman

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
11,642
1
0
well on guys...i dont really care, unless it's like beastly. then it's just like... wow i wonder who would want to touch that.


on girls..a little hair on the back aint bad unless it's like thick and black..little lighter hairs i dont care. just my opinion or preference.
 

Scrapster

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2000
3,746
0
0
as if you need to ask... :)


Well, I mean... Why is it any different than hair on your head, your ass, your legs, your labia, or your sack? All it is, is another place to scratch. Why is it considered an outcast?
 

CuriousAndy

Banned
May 28, 2001
1,563
0
0
Simple. Because it is out of the norm of what people perceive beauty as, mainly resulted by what media projects.

This conversation is now over.
~andy
 

Logix

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2001
3,627
0
0
Generally, any ungroomed/untrimmed hair is not too pleasing. It's hard to groom back hair... but if you have enough that you can, then damn! :Q
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,249
6,636
126
It comes from one of the few Homo Erectus genes to express in modern man, which makes it exceedingly quaint.
 

amnesiac

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
15,781
1
71
Being half-asian and thus inheriting the "hairless" gene, I can say that it is definitely an ADVANTAGE when it comes to women. ;) Them likes to touch my hairless chest. :p

Of course I know girls who prefer really hairy sweaty men too...
 

TheBlondOne

Golden Member
Jul 14, 2001
1,081
0
0
Because really hairy guys remind us of animals. And it's gross to have sex with an animal (a real one, we don't mind when the guys ACT like animals....but that's a different thread).

However, when chicks are in love it doesn't matter. I dated a full-blooded Italian and he had a hairy back. I didn't care then. Now I can be picky, though. ;) Just kidding!

--Sarah