- Jan 21, 2002
- 6,944
- 3
- 81
Just wondering, cause I don't get it.
My son starts 3rd grade this week. There are 35 students in his class. His teacher said there are no classroom aids because they don't have the money for it. The parents buy all the markers, pencils, glue, kleenex, etc. The parents are asked to help by bringing snacks and to help in the classroom.
Our state spends 10k per year per student and the democrats are acting like anyone opposed to raising taxes is mean and evil because we are in a "budget crisis" and the kids are suffering.
One of the local private schools charges $3500 a year in tuition. They raise another $1500 a year per student in donations and fundraisers. Total cost of educating the student = $5000 a year. Class sizes are smaller, the schools have more and better materials, and the students perform better on state tests.
So why can't the public schools do a comparable job with TWICE as much money ?
My son starts 3rd grade this week. There are 35 students in his class. His teacher said there are no classroom aids because they don't have the money for it. The parents buy all the markers, pencils, glue, kleenex, etc. The parents are asked to help by bringing snacks and to help in the classroom.
Our state spends 10k per year per student and the democrats are acting like anyone opposed to raising taxes is mean and evil because we are in a "budget crisis" and the kids are suffering.
One of the local private schools charges $3500 a year in tuition. They raise another $1500 a year per student in donations and fundraisers. Total cost of educating the student = $5000 a year. Class sizes are smaller, the schools have more and better materials, and the students perform better on state tests.
So why can't the public schools do a comparable job with TWICE as much money ?