Virgorising
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2013
- 4,470
- 0
- 0
I've become more conscientious of privacy lately and have found myself avoiding Chrome even though I wouldn't say I'm particularly worried about using it, especially with extensions.
I have toyed around with alternative builds of Chromium/webkit that I would feel better about using, Comodo Dragon was particularly enjoyable, and Midori was also interesting (very light)
But ultimately I've found myself landing with PaleMoon x64 using Disconnect+Adblock+NoScript. And while Chrome/Chromium has seen support for many such extensions (some of which I have found the Chrome version to be a bit better), NoScript is still a major "selling" point for me with FireFox/PaleMoon.
See this and this regarding privacy in chrome. tl;dr It's basically a non-issue.
I used both links. Non issue is in the eye of the beholder. And anyone can spin anything until it's detialed reality is obfuscated to many.
Can you site some sources for your claims? And is it really in the "eye of the beholder" when you can prove it through capturing the packets chrome sends/receives?
Chrome is alright, Chromium (open source) is better but can get unstable if you keep up with daily respitority. I end up going back to Chrome after using Waterfox, IE9/10, Opera, Firefox, Palemoon, etc. Chrome(ium) just suits my web surfing preferences, and that you don't need to install Flash player because it has it built in. Youtube videos crashes or stops responding with all other browsers occasionally, not with Chrome/Chromium and extensions are a bit nicer than Firefox's and Opera's.
And why do you have issues with WYSiWG? I don't.
And why do you have issues with WYSiWG? I don't.
it's not just on this forum. it's on ANY forum. unless something has changed.He's complaining about the editor on the AT forums in Chrome. If you use an extension to make Chrome spit out a firefox user agent string, you actually get a rich editor on the AT forums; if you let Chrome report it's Chrome, you get a basic text editor.
It's a bug on AT with their theme or with vBulletin.
He's complaining about the editor on the AT forums in Chrome. If you use an extension to make Chrome spit out a firefox user agent string, you actually get a rich editor on the AT forums; if you let Chrome report it's Chrome, you get a basic text editor.
It's a bug on AT with their theme or with vBulletin.
Chrome is the king of spyware.
OMG! you're right! I just tried it on my forums as well. same thing, no WYSIWYG
It's not a bug, it's just that Chrome doesn't work with WYSIYG on vBulletin 3 forums.
I tried copy/pasting something from a vBulletin 4 forum, and it copied everything the images, links, formatting
meh = pwned
but still, I don't understand why vBulletin 3 WYSIWG works with Pale Moon/Firefox but doesn't with Chromeonly higher versions work
1) I throw up when I look at its interface
1) I throw up when I look at its interface
2) Most important for me, I use copy/paste a lot on my forums and need everything in a post I copy to be pasted, like the links, pics, formatting, etc.
Chrome has no WYSIWYG editor so it only pastes plain text.
The extension for WYSIWG for Chrome has been discontinued and you can no longer install it. Thus forcing me to use Firefox even if its faster
and Opera sucks even more. no ad block plus, no decent add-ons, fugly interface, no better than Chromeagree on 1
about 2. i HATE when copy paste brings over formatting, holy crap do i hate that, i want it to be text and the text only. it pisses me off in IE at work.
luckily opera works how i want it to
the rest of you list i dont care about, i newver use chrome anyway, its always been Opera for me and i suplment with Pale Moon or IE when needed
and what's worse, 60% of the world uses it, probably it is enforced in every app you install these daysIf I'm honest, the last time I used Chrome I go physically hurt. I opened a new tab and my appendix acted up. Had to be rushed to the hospital too.
Google Chrome, never again.
and Opera sucks even more. no ad block plus, no decent add-ons, fugly interface, no better than Chrome
just my 2 cents
WTF opera has had built in add blocking for like a decade and has the same AB+ addon that FF uses (is using version 12) its the only addon i use on any browser.
One thing I've noticed about Chrome is that it seems to have lots of errors and features not working. I guess this is because they are so intent on making it fast that they don't always make working well a priority?
Everytime a webpage does not work in Chrome, I turn to Firefox and it works just great.