It costs the tax payer money to make it a collective right.
It makes us less safe to make it a collective right or to place restrictions on individual rights to keep and bear arms.
Adolf Hitler and FDR believed it was a collective right.
Collective ownership of firearms is dangerous to life, liberty, and property, which is a major reason why I prefer the Articles of Confederation--it was a peaceful, agrarian, and disarmed state; under the Constitution the state has been industrialized, armed and the citizenry has been disarmed. It's the same as comparing Sega's Sonic CD's Past to its Bad Future. If we were under the Articles of Confederation, we would be in the Good Future today, because Sonic (Thomas Jefferson) would've destroyed the evil Dr. Robotnik (Alexander Hamilton).
The results of arms can be drastically different between having them in the hands of the state vs the hands of the citizenry.
The state should be disarmed and collective ownership of firearms abolished.
Why shouldn't the state be disarmed?
It makes us less safe to make it a collective right or to place restrictions on individual rights to keep and bear arms.
Adolf Hitler and FDR believed it was a collective right.
Collective ownership of firearms is dangerous to life, liberty, and property, which is a major reason why I prefer the Articles of Confederation--it was a peaceful, agrarian, and disarmed state; under the Constitution the state has been industrialized, armed and the citizenry has been disarmed. It's the same as comparing Sega's Sonic CD's Past to its Bad Future. If we were under the Articles of Confederation, we would be in the Good Future today, because Sonic (Thomas Jefferson) would've destroyed the evil Dr. Robotnik (Alexander Hamilton).
The results of arms can be drastically different between having them in the hands of the state vs the hands of the citizenry.
The state should be disarmed and collective ownership of firearms abolished.
Why shouldn't the state be disarmed?
