Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I thought the human eye can only discern 40fps and less - everything above is a waste.
Originally posted by: wfbberzerker
movies already use huge amounts film for just 24fps. not only would doing 60fps use almost 3 times as much film, it would be much more expensive, with only a negligible increase in film quality.
Originally posted by: BCskunk
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I thought the human eye can only discern 40fps and less - everything above is a waste.
i thought it was 60fps