Originally posted by: destrekor
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
How about the people that are wrongly convicted and then exonerated by DNA evidence. Were they going to deserve it? Or is that different?
if they were wrongly convicted and put to death, painless or painful they would still be dead. the bigger wrong is that they were put to death for something they didnt do.
i say make it hurt. why do these people get humane punishment for violent crimes they committed?
How about not killing them at all but keeping them in an unpleasant prison for the rest of their lives? Death is not a punishment-- ask anyone who is suicidal.
humans have in their mind natural survival instincts, we all wish to live through all scenarios, the hope being we live a fulfilling and meaningful life, but the main part being that we live. the suicidals are the exception, but they are failures as humans so let them depart our world. if they don't want to live, let them do their thing.
You're missing my point. Once the person is dead, he isn't suffering and therefore not being punished. Saddam Hussein would be rotting in a jail cell, thinking about all the evil he has done and what he has been reduced to, if he wasn't executed. He'd probably WANT to die, and denying him death would be a punishment. Instead, he is simply non-existent. Not much of a punishment. (although in this case keeping him alive might be dangerous since he still has followers)
Then, obviously, there's the fact that innocent people are inevitably executed. If even one innocent person is executed, that makes the death penalty not worthwile, no matter what your personal beliefs are.
There's a reason why the rest of the developed world and most of the developing world has abolished the death penalty-- because they recognize that killing is wrong. Period. And also because they recognize and do not accept the risk of killing an innocent person.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment