I'm Japanese too and I agree. If you can spell Domestic or American, which both have the same amount of letters in them, you can spell Japanese.
Japanese people do not call each other Japs btw.
Anyway, back on topic.
I believe its because those companies have become so mainstream and their target audience so broad that to make an FI vehicle would be asking for higher service expenses. The average person wouldn't know not to start up a turbo right after turning it on or even buy a turbo timer. Those other cars you see like the WRX are really tailored towards specific audiences that know a bit about cars, IMO.
geno
Lifer
- Dec 26, 1999
- 25,074
- 4
- 0
Nitrous isn't forced induction
Depends on what your definition of "big deal" is, many people like the power right there as soon as they mash the pedal, and every turbo car suffers from lag, just in varying degrees from one case to the next.
Any RPM? That's an embellishment, cmon Flyermax
Within the motor's limits. It's not as easy as just cranking the boost up and going unless you have something to manage your fuel and spark curves as well. Sure, you can have a motor tuned for say, 18psi, and then turn your boost down and you'll be fine, but going beyond that may be dangerous. I love turbos and all, but it's not as simple as cranking the boost and leaving it.
geno
Lifer
- Dec 26, 1999
- 25,074
- 4
- 0
300Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Perhaps, but the VG30DETT made more than enough HP and torque all across the powerband
Again, about 10 HP away from what the VQ35 makes. If someone could come up with some stock tourque curves, that'd be great. I'm willing to bet the curves are comparible.No, it really did make 320HP, just like the 3000GT and most other supercars of that era. They were all rated at 280ps(276hp) but every single one of them put out at least 320HP if not 330 (Lancer Evo and Skyline come to mind).Originally posted by: geno
300Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Perhaps, but the VG30DETT made more than enough HP and torque all across the powerband
Since when is nitrous not considered FI?Originally posted by: geno
Nitrous isn't forced induction
Depends on what your definition of "big deal" is, many people like the power right there as soon as they mash the pedal, and every turbo car suffers from lag, just in varying degrees from one case to the next.
Any RPM? That's an embellishment, cmon Flyermax
Within the motor's limits. It's not as easy as just cranking the boost up and going unless you have something to manage your fuel and spark curves as well. Sure, you can have a motor tuned for say, 18psi, and then turn your boost down and you'll be fine, but going beyond that may be dangerous. I love turbos and all, but it's not as simple as cranking the boost and leaving it.
My turbo does spool up from *any* RPM, it's insanely quick-spooling. The 13G is a tiny turbo. It's the same turbo they use on the WRX (non-STI).
I know you can't just turn up the boost to your heart's content, but considering that there's no NA equivalent of upping the boost, I'd still go with FI.
geno
Lifer
- Dec 26, 1999
- 25,074
- 4
- 0
Well I've never seen anything in terms of proof of higher than 300HP numbers in the American version. I remember the Supra and the 3000GT being rated for 320 if memory serves correct, but the 300ZX was behind them somewhat.
As for the Nitrous being Forced Induction - "Forced" means there's air being forcably pushed into the engine, something Nitrous doesn't do.
I bet there's limits to your motor's spooling up, take it uphill @ 1300 RPMs and mash the gas, what do you get for boost?
As for the Nitrous being Forced Induction - "Forced" means there's air being forcably pushed into the engine, something Nitrous doesn't do.
I bet there's limits to your motor's spooling up, take it uphill @ 1300 RPMs and mash the gas, what do you get for boost?
For tuning and upping power, Turbos are the way to go. But when it comes down to it, and tuning/modding is out of the picture, I'd rather have N/A power than Turbo power anyday.
Nope, the "big 3" super cars of the 90's (Supra, 3000GT, 300ZX) all had 320HP. I can see why you think the 300ZX would have 300hp though
It's a common misnomer, due to the name of the vehicle. I assure you, it really did have 320hp Why? That's about what the Mazdaspeed Protege puts out...
Mazda isn't really about the whole "insane levels of power" thing... They're more of a power-to-weight ratio company that focuses on building light vehicles that have good weight distribution and handle well.
I hope you are kidding. They were the 300s or 3000s bc they had 3.0 liter engines not 300HP.Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Nope, the "big 3" super cars of the 90's (Supra, 3000GT, 300ZX) all had 320HP. I can see why you think the 300ZX would have 300hp though
geno
Lifer
- Dec 26, 1999
- 25,074
- 4
- 0
You can't read, can you?Originally posted by: Doggiedog
I hope you are kidding. They were the 300s or 3000s bc they had 3.0 liter engines not 300HP.Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Nope, the "big 3" super cars of the 90's (Supra, 3000GT, 300ZX) all had 320HP. I can see why you think the 300ZX would have 300hp though
"It's a common misnomer, due to the name of the vehicle"
Do you understand what that sentence means?
Fine, it's got 300hpOriginally posted by: geno
It'sOriginally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Nope, the "big 3" super cars of the 90's (Supra, 3000GT, 300ZX) all had 320HP. I can see why you think the 300ZX would have 300hp though
300
Trust Me
Every single Z owner I know has said it had 320hp stock though, guess they inflated their car's hp to compete with Supra and 3000GT owners
And I think people nowadays are too easily offended. It was not used in a racist manner, so stop bitching.
It doesn't matter whether the person making the comment thinks it was racist, that's for the people whom the term refers to to decide.
Well then, I think the term "American" or "Human" is racist, because I am a god among men. I dont like being called something lower than me, so refer to me at "Your lordship" "Your holiness" or "God" from now on. kthxbye
Then never call me, or other Scottish people, Scots. That's racist, and you'll hurt my poor little feelings, you oversensitive, prepubescent, whiny, perpetual bigot.
Aaaahhh. Sweet release. Don't take that personally, just needed to get that out somehow.
Typical white male response
People who have never been subject to racism don't tend to be too sympathetic to people of other races who have been subject to racism.
We also don't perpetuate it as much.Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Typical white male response(for the record, I'm a white male too)
People who have never been subject to racism don't tend to be too sympathetic to people of other races who have been subject to racism.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 20K
-
Solved! Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)- Started by Vattila
- Replies: 12K
-
-
-
Question Geekbench 6 released and calibrated against Core i7-12700
- Started by igor_kavinski
- Replies: 275
Facebook
Twitter