Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
It adds cost, complexity, wear and tear, and noise.
And of course increased fuel consumption over an NA engine if you're going to get any power out of it.Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
It adds cost, complexity, wear and tear, and noise.
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
It adds cost, complexity, wear and tear, and noise.
But other than that you are saying it's perfect for all vehicles?![]()
Originally posted by: vi_edit
This thread blows
Originally posted by: sdifox
As the engineering in cars improve, I don't see why the cars are not ALL superchaged? Is there anything inherently bad for the car? I understand their lifespan would be reduced, but most car are scrapped before then anyway.
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Originally posted by: vi_edit
This thread blows
Ohhhh, so that's how you get Elite status. Good to know.
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Originally posted by: vi_edit
This thread blows
Ohhhh, so that's how you get Elite status. Good to know.
No, a turbo is more efficient than a supercharger. Each has their adv & disadv, making it unique to everyone's situation.Originally posted by: gregshin
turbo > supercharger
Originally posted by: sdifox
As the engineering in cars improve, I don't see why the cars are not ALL superchaged? Is there anything inherently bad for the car? I understand their lifespan would be reduced, but most car are scrapped before then anyway.