N new99 Senior member Oct 11, 1999 251 0 0 Oct 14, 2001 #1 why doesn't Bush show evidence?.. if its so solid, they can at least show a little bit? i don't really understand.. cons and pros of showing evidence? edit: hi mod? y is this locked? sorry, but i dont understand it isn't porn? thanks.
why doesn't Bush show evidence?.. if its so solid, they can at least show a little bit? i don't really understand.. cons and pros of showing evidence? edit: hi mod? y is this locked? sorry, but i dont understand it isn't porn? thanks.
G gogeeta13 Diamond Member Dec 31, 2000 5,721 0 0 Oct 14, 2001 #2 because we have none. Listen closely, we aren't attacking because of WTC, we are attacking terrorism in general.. Alfga happens to have tons of Ts, so we are attacking them
because we have none. Listen closely, we aren't attacking because of WTC, we are attacking terrorism in general.. Alfga happens to have tons of Ts, so we are attacking them