I heard that the PII X6 default vcore varies from 1.275-1.375v. That's ridiculous and AMD could probably make more money if they had like 3-5 black edition levels.
The vcore varies to save power when you aren't stressing the processor. I think it would be nicer if AMD could get a few faster X6's out, but I don't know if that is actually possible.
Sometimes I wonder if AMD has plans to scale the Athlon/Phenom II's to 32nm? They haven't mentioned it, but it might make sense. BD is their future, but I believe it's going for the high-end of the market; wouldn't 32nm Athlon's/Phenom's make sense in the budget market? It would also allow those who own AM3 to extend the life of their system (which may be bad if AMD is counting on those to upgrade to BD).
To add to this, it would have been nice for AMD to work up some 32nm Phenom II's, which would enable higher clocking and/or lower power -
Llano is essentially that. Apparently they are expecting Llano variants to be the entire mainstream in the 2nd half of this year (not counting the really cheap stuff). I'm really excited to see what Stars can do on 32nm, but barring mobile (where the CPU+GPU will be awesome for low-cost gaming laptops) I'm just not sure Stars is going to be able to remain relevant for much longer...
Llano is essentially that. Apparently they are expecting Llano variants to be the entire mainstream in the 2nd half of this year (not counting the really cheap stuff). I'm really excited to see what Stars can do on 32nm, but barring mobile (where the CPU+GPU will be awesome for low-cost gaming laptops) I'm just not sure Stars is going to be able to remain relevant for much longer...