Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: eskimospy
I would love to know how we spend 'tons of money to defent a whiney world'. Do you honestly think Europe needs us to defend it? Is that why you think we have troops in Germany? I'll give you a hint: our troops are in these countries to enforce OUR interests, not as some sort of favor to them.
As far as 'fixer uppers' being cheaper, that's ludicrous. The idea that you would even try to compare the valuable resource exports from Africa with the high tech/financial/etc resources of Europe is crazy too. I see this as a common theme from people in America, that they think we are holding up the world on our shoulders, that we give this vast amount of aid to help everyone else out, that we're protecting everyone. It's a load of shit. Get over it.
Do you understand the concept of "spheres of influence" ?
No i certainly dont.... and i couldnt get a word of what eskimospy said.
Those bases were setup during the cold war to fend off a supposedly massive communist aggression against all members of the NATO/G8/OECD.. this was according to the CIA.
These bases then made war efforts possible in vietnam, afghanistan.. covert operations in iran, nicaragua, middle east etc etc.
Just as there is a global supply chain for walmart. There is a global supply chain for the US army. You think that 140,000 troops just magically appeared in the Iraqi dessert.
And then there are your local arms manufacturers. Those bases don't run .. Boeing , Lockheed Martin dont run .......
.dead simple..
Basically its a bankrupt policy. The US share in world GDP WILL decline especially since India and China are at a take-off point economically. Without heavy debt you cant seriously finance all this.
But hey there might be willing successors(aka suckers) to this way of thinking. The US Navy and the Indian navy jointly patrol many of the sea routes of APAC countries. This form of outsourcing is not very welcome by our politicians who are opposed to any engagement with the USA.