- Mar 15, 2003
- 12,668
- 103
- 106
So my unintentional experiment of the week was with a cheap coffee maker- my expensive calphalon coffeemaker died and the rma's on its way, but we needed coffee stat. Bought a cheap $20 black and decker and the cup this morning was absolutely dreadful. It taste burnt but the damn thing doesn't even have a hot plate. Annoyed, I disassembled the thing to make basically a pour over filter holder (using the coffee maker just to heat the water). AMAZINGLY different results, same beans same parts just reconfigured.
My question is, isn't drip coffee technically the same process (hot water dispersed on beans, filtered downward)? What is it about the pour over process that makes it so much better tasting? Is it the fact that it's slower? Would turning off the machine throughout the process (allowing the grounds to bloom) replicate that? couldn't coffee maker manufacturer's emulate this process (mostly the stirring of the grounds and the slower pace) to make a dope drip coffee maker? Hmmm. I obviously have a lot of free time on my hands.
Moved from P&N
AT Moderator ElFenix
My question is, isn't drip coffee technically the same process (hot water dispersed on beans, filtered downward)? What is it about the pour over process that makes it so much better tasting? Is it the fact that it's slower? Would turning off the machine throughout the process (allowing the grounds to bloom) replicate that? couldn't coffee maker manufacturer's emulate this process (mostly the stirring of the grounds and the slower pace) to make a dope drip coffee maker? Hmmm. I obviously have a lot of free time on my hands.
Moved from P&N
AT Moderator ElFenix