How come there are no high quality AC97 CODECs out there?
Motherboard manufacturers have to either spend a little on these cheap AC97 CODECs, or spend a lot on an expensive DSP, which handles the AC97 functions, plus a I2S DAC. How come companies that make these high quality I2S DACs for standalone soundcards like Philips/Wolfson/Cirrus Logic do not just make a AC97 CODEC?
It is absurd to require a DSP (which MSI does on their boards with SB Live 24-bit, adding to costs significantly) for better sound, when all people need is just a better DAC. Unless you need hardware EAX, which is done in software anyways for all cards except high end Creative Labs cards.
So how about just a 5.1 AC97 codec from Wolfson, which offloads EAX and mixing to the CPU, on a motherboard? It will cost significantly more than the Realtek ones, but it still still be significantly less than what MSI does (integrated SB Live 24-bit) or Chaintech used to do (integrated Envy24).
Motherboard manufacturers have to either spend a little on these cheap AC97 CODECs, or spend a lot on an expensive DSP, which handles the AC97 functions, plus a I2S DAC. How come companies that make these high quality I2S DACs for standalone soundcards like Philips/Wolfson/Cirrus Logic do not just make a AC97 CODEC?
It is absurd to require a DSP (which MSI does on their boards with SB Live 24-bit, adding to costs significantly) for better sound, when all people need is just a better DAC. Unless you need hardware EAX, which is done in software anyways for all cards except high end Creative Labs cards.
So how about just a 5.1 AC97 codec from Wolfson, which offloads EAX and mixing to the CPU, on a motherboard? It will cost significantly more than the Realtek ones, but it still still be significantly less than what MSI does (integrated SB Live 24-bit) or Chaintech used to do (integrated Envy24).