Why does New Jersey . . .

[Cyberian]

. . have so many Toxic Waste sites, and California has so many Lawyers??

A.) New Jersey had first choice.

 

[MournSanity]

They're both full of crap.

 

[jurzdevil]

the toxic waste sites are conctrated by nyc. everywhere else is just fine.

 

[Zim Hosein]

Originally posted by: jurzdevil
the toxic waste sites are conctrated by nyc. everywhere else is just fine.

LOL jurzdevil :beer:

 

[Sundog]

Originally posted by: jurzdevil
the toxic waste sites are conctrated by nyc. everywhere else is just fine.

not, try Libby Montana where the asbestos plant used to be.

 

[Brutuskend]

Maybe N.J. thinks it helps their gardens grow?

It IS after all the garden state!

As far as Cal. goes, where there's $$$ the lawyers are SURE to follow!!

 

[jurzdevil]

Originally posted by: Sundog

Originally posted by: jurzdevil
the toxic waste sites are conctrated by nyc. everywhere else is just fine.

not, try Libby Montana where the asbestos plant used to be.

its not that bad...just dont stay long

 

[Cyberian]

A.) New Jersey had first choice.

 

[KrustyVT]

Originally posted by: Cyberian
. . have so many Toxic Waste sites, and California has so many Lawyers??

A.) New Jersey had first choice.

Why are the Long Islanders starting these "rag on NJ" threads? We have enough of these from the Southerners.

-=K=-

 

[crab]

I lub teh NJ.

 

[isekii]

Originally posted by: KrustyVT

Originally posted by: Cyberian
. . have so many Toxic Waste sites, and California has so many Lawyers??

A.) New Jersey had first choice.

Why are the Long Islanders starting these "rag on NJ" threads? We have enough of these from the Southerners.

-=K=-

Well I don't blame them. Look at the LIE.
They wish it could be like the Turnpike