Why does nascar still use solid rear axles?

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Anyone?

I just came across a pic of a nascar exploding with the rear axle flying out... to my surprise it's a solid piece (?!?!?)
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: senseamp
Smooth pavement, don't really need IRS. Plus the crowd loves crashes ;)

Even with smooth road, won't you ride on the edge of the tires when you corner hard? The dynamic mass of the car will shift to the outside of the turn, which in turns lifts the axle some too (so it's no longer parallel to the road and tires aren't gripping 100%)
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
The same reason they use pushrod V8s and carbs rather than fuel injection. They're required to.
 

Nyati13

Senior member
Jan 2, 2003
785
1
76
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: senseamp
Smooth pavement, don't really need IRS. Plus the crowd loves crashes ;)

Even with smooth road, won't you ride on the edge of the tires when you corner hard? The dynamic mass of the car will shift to the outside of the turn, which in turns lifts the axle some too (so it's no longer parallel to the road and tires aren't gripping 100%)

In any race they have 3 to 4 known corners, with exact angles, turn rates etc, all already pre-determined. They can setup the axles spring rates and other suspension geometry so specifically that using a solid axle isn't really any detriment. They have to go through all those hoops to tune the solid axle, because it's in the rule book, that they have to use a solid rear axle.
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
34
91
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: senseamp
Smooth pavement, don't really need IRS. Plus the crowd loves crashes ;)

Even with smooth road, won't you ride on the edge of the tires when you corner hard? The dynamic mass of the car will shift to the outside of the turn, which in turns lifts the axle some too (so it's no longer parallel to the road and tires aren't gripping 100%)

On smooth pavement there's no real benefit to IRS aside from reducing unsprung weight. There were racing classes back in the 1980's that allowed both solid axle and IRS cars (on road courses, not ovals) and the IRS cars showed no advantage over the solid axle vehicles.

ZV
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
NASCAR's formula has a number of grandfathered things in, many to keep costs down and the field even. As absurd as the costs of racing in NASCAR are, when you compare them to series like Lemans and F1 it's peanuts. If you wanted to make a car that handled as good as you can make a car handle, NASCAR isn't the place to look, there's too many rules that keep good stuff out to keep costs and speeds down.
 

funboy6942

Lifer
Nov 13, 2001
15,340
404
126
Your always going left, not like it would really matter if it had it or not. Straight, left, left a little more, straight, straight straight, left, left hard, brakes, left, straight. Besides if they did have it, the car would tend to lean because in stead of a straight axle, it be like a slant when you go left, and would make the car really want to roll, at which point the driver would go into a slide causing him to turn right, and that would confuse him and a big crash would happen with other drivers having to learn how to turn right to avoid the crash, ending up with more crashing.

Thats why there are rules since most drivers been driving left all their life starting with go carts, skipping school to drive for Nascar at the age of 15, and not have the mental capacity to do 2 things at once.

 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Cause grandpappy din' need none-o-dem newfangled jap-iron tecknolagee so's i don' need none eider. We races 'em like duh good larwd intended us to. Throw me anuther one o' dem Coors Lights, will ya Billy?

;)
 

Pulsar

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2003
5,224
306
126
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Cause grandpappy din' need none-o-dem newfangled jap-iron tecknolagee so's i don' need none eider. We races 'em like duh good larwd intended us to. Throw me anuther one o' dem Coors Lights, will ya Billy?

;)

Because all advancements in the area of automobiles have been by the Japanese. Obviously. :roll:
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Originally posted by: funboy6942
Your always going left, not like it would really matter if it had it or not. Straight, left, left a little more, straight, straight straight, left, left hard, brakes, left, straight. Besides if they did have it, the car would tend to lean because in stead of a straight axle, it be like a slant when you go left, and would make the car really want to roll, at which point the driver would go into a slide causing him to turn right, and that would confuse him and a big crash would happen with other drivers having to learn how to turn right to avoid the crash, ending up with more crashing.

Thats why there are rules since most drivers been driving left all their life starting with go carts, skipping school to drive for Nascar at the age of 15, and not have the mental capacity to do 2 things at once.
I can tell you're a big fan.
 

boomhower

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2007
7,228
19
81
The short answer is costs. They could have implemented it a couple years ago when they came out with the new car but there really was no reason to increase the costs beyond what they already are. They reason that they won't go to EFI is two fold, one is cost and the other is that it is to hard to police.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
Originally posted by: funboy6942
Your always going left, not like it would really matter if it had it or not. Straight, left, left a little more, straight, straight straight, left, left hard, brakes, left, straight. Besides if they did have it, the car would tend to lean because in stead of a straight axle, it be like a slant when you go left, and would make the car really want to roll, at which point the driver would go into a slide causing him to turn right, and that would confuse him and a big crash would happen with other drivers having to learn how to turn right to avoid the crash, ending up with more crashing.

Thats why there are rules since most drivers been driving left all their life starting with go carts, skipping school to drive for Nascar at the age of 15, and not have the mental capacity to do 2 things at once.

http://nascar.suite101.com/art..._drivers_invade_nascar
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: funboy6942
Your always going left, not like it would really matter if it had it or not. Straight, left, left a little more, straight, straight straight, left, left hard, brakes, left, straight. Besides if they did have it, the car would tend to lean because in stead of a straight axle, it be like a slant when you go left, and would make the car really want to roll, at which point the driver would go into a slide causing him to turn right, and that would confuse him and a big crash would happen with other drivers having to learn how to turn right to avoid the crash, ending up with more crashing.

Thats why there are rules since most drivers been driving left all their life starting with go carts, skipping school to drive for Nascar at the age of 15, and not have the mental capacity to do 2 things at once.

http://nascar.suite101.com/art..._drivers_invade_nascar

And Jimmy Johnson won the SCORE off road championship rookie of the year in 1998.
 

LordMorpheus

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2002
6,871
1
0
They use them because of the rules. NASCAR is all about big, simple cars racing each other. A race ready cup car would cost a tiny fraction of a race ready F1 car, due to the restrictions to older tech.

Some of the tracks are quite bumpy, too, which makes things interesting.
 

Kirby

Lifer
Apr 10, 2006
12,028
2
0
I think it's pretty cool that Nascar has a NA engine less than 6 liters that has around 750 HP.
 

geno

Lifer
Dec 26, 1999
25,074
4
0
They don't need to "dance" much, so a solid axle does them just fine.