<< Last time I drove 45 minutes to the other side of town to pick him up and we had a fight over money and she locked herself and him in the house and refused my visitation, I called the police. They showed up. They told me "this is a civil thing, not a legal thing..get a lawyer." Then they left. >>
My friend, welcome to penishood. You have a penis, therefore you are always the aggressor, never the victim. You don't need anyone's help or compassion, and probably don't deserve it, vis-a-vis your member status in the brotherhood of the penis.
There are innumerable organizations and government agencies entirely funded for the purpose of helping mothers and making 'fathers' pay, though the operative word should be "parent" and never carry a connotation of gender. If the roles were switched, your penis-lacking counterpart would have no trouble finding any number of attorney's or "women advocate" organizations to take up her cause - usually pro bono.
When my friend's ex-wife took the children and moved to Texas, Michigan assisted Texas in ensuring that child-support payments were then transferred to Texas. Except, for some six weeks after she moved, my friend paid into the Michigan friend of the court fund, at the same time he was forced to pay into the Texas friend of the court fund. He was getting socked DOUBLE, and it took another six weeks to get that amount credited back to him, but nobody was concerned that he could barely afford to eat AND pay rent during this time. After all, this is "for the children", right?
When his ex-wife was accused of being an unfit mother by Texas agencies, Texas called my friend and said, "Your children are being temporarily removed from their mother's home. You have 4 days to come pick them up or they're going into foster care." He dropped everything and got them. Remember, the system only cares about "the children", they don't take 'sides', or so the official line goes.
For over two months while the case was in the courts, not only did my friend continue to pay child-support to Texas, but HE HAD CUSTODY OF THE CHILDREN (including the burden of feeding, housing, clothing, buying school supplies, etc.) Texas was willing to stop tapping his paycheck, but he would need to come to Texas in order to make the necessary arrangements (paperwork). He thought that since Michigan was an advocate for the mother in her bid to have child-support transferred to Texas, then certainly Michigan would be an advocate for him to get the payments STOPPED since he now had physical custody of the children. Remember, they don't 'take sides', its "for the children", and he was falling behind in all of his responsibilities including rent.
Michigan refused to do anything, claiming it wasn't their responsibility. It was their responsibility when it was the WOMAN seeking money from another state, but not when the intervention is on the father's behalf. For the children? I've got a bridge to sell ya.
On the verge of being evicted, he finally found an attorney in Texas who would help him for a flat fee of $500. Both Michigan and Texas would provide all necessary legal assistance free of charge to mothers, but fathers don't count, I guess.
Not to sound callous, but your story is a TYPICAL one. You should consider yourself fortunate that she doesn't try to make your life REALLY difficult, because the state would unilaterally support her effort to do so; "for the children", of course.