Btw, most of the people that bashed linixator here are ignorant and elisist. They read the post and replied to him in an elitist perspective, not an open one. In order for linux to be an alternative to XP, it needs to be more user friendly. You all may say that the only the the user has to do is to read the documentation, and practice with it, but that is the main problem with linux right now. The learning curve is very steep compared to microsoft's learning curve, and it will take patience and time to get things up and runnning. Most basic users do not have the time and patience. They just want to surf their web, or watch their latest dvd on their computer hastle free. (Yes installing linux may be easy for you, but it may be a challenge to other people not experienced with linux. If they have a problem, where will they turn to? Yes, they will turn to their "other" windows or mac computer and go online to troubleshoot.)
Although some people in this forum do not think linux is for the basic user, major distributers may disagree. They are currently selling linux with packaged software, hoping to draw people into linux. Some of you out there may see that as a bad thing, but giving users a cheap and stable alternative to XP will help force microsoft to lower the prices on XP, and give everyone a win-win
Finally, please don't flame people, just because you don't disagree with them. The linuxator came out and posted his opinion about where linux is right now, and how he thinks linux could be improved, and a bunch of linux die hards go out and discredit everything he has to say with a bunch of insults, and no insight.