Originally posted by: Nitemare
Milosevic and Hussein tried to commit genocide on them and Turkey wants them dead as well.
What exactly did they do wrong?
Don't they for the most part follow a bastardized version of Islam which pisses of the Sunni's and the Shiites?Originally posted by: Trezza
Its like hitler and the jews in WWII. There are just a weak group being exploited for the advancement of a demented leader.
Originally posted by: kleinesarschloch
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Milosevic and Hussein tried to commit genocide on them and Turkey wants them dead as well.
What exactly did they do wrong?
this is how uninformed you are:
1. kurds don't even live in former yugoslavia
2. the grand total of the milosevic "genocide" was some 2800 dead bodies, including combatants from both sides.
3. it is quite obvious why kurds are hated in that region by just about every sovereign country: they want an independent state kurdistan. btw, turkey is no better at dealing with kurds than iraq, you just don't hear much about it.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Don't they for the most part follow a bastardized version of Islam which pisses of the Sunni's and the Shiites?Originally posted by: Trezza
Its like hitler and the jews in WWII. There are just a weak group being exploited for the advancement of a demented leader.
3. Kurdistan would contain oil fields and plenty of water. I don't see any harm in it's formation, you don't exactly hear about too many kurdish extremists blowing up civilians now do you?
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Don't they for the most part follow a bastardized version of Islam which pisses of the Sunni's and the Shiites?Originally posted by: Trezza
Its like hitler and the jews in WWII. There are just a weak group being exploited for the advancement of a demented leader.
One which it is wrong to kill women and children from what I've heard...
One which it is wrong to kill women and children from what I've heard...
1. ok relocated versions of kurds (cousins if you will)
2. I've seen no where where they said the death toll was 2800, most agree that it is between 10-50k, what is an acceptable number of deaths for you?
3. Kurdistan would contain oil fields and plenty of water. I don't see any harm in it's formation, you don't exactly hear about too many kurdish extremists blowing up civilians now do you?
Originally posted by: kleinesarschloch
1. ok relocated versions of kurds (cousins if you will)
2. I've seen no where where they said the death toll was 2800, most agree that it is between 10-50k, what is an acceptable number of deaths for you?
3. Kurdistan would contain oil fields and plenty of water. I don't see any harm in it's formation, you don't exactly hear about too many kurdish extremists blowing up civilians now do you?
1. no, not even close. the albanian population of kosovo has nothing in common with the kurds, except for their religion.
2. the number of approx. 2800 is according to the hague tribunal. the number is not publicized much for obvious reasons. in a war against terror, which yugoslavia was involved in, sometimes civilians die. i'm sure you can appreciate this fact as an american.
3. what sovereign country on this planet would give someone a good chunk of their territory just because they request it?
3. Iraq, Israel, Pakistan, India, Australia....et al were all given their land
1 which is why they were killed
2 no one is certain, but 2800 is the lowest I have ever heard
3. Iraq, Israel, Pakistan, India, Australia....et al were all given their land
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Don't they for the most part follow a bastardized version of Islam which pisses of the Sunni's and the Shiites?Originally posted by: Trezza
Its like hitler and the jews in WWII. There are just a weak group being exploited for the advancement of a demented leader.
One which it is wrong to kill women and children from what I've heard...
It should be wrong to kill period, I cant stand the 'lets die for allah' circulating in the Arab world.
Originally posted by: kleinesarschloch
thanks for providing an unbiased source.![]()
I take it you are a Fan of that Chronic Bedwetter! Maybe you are one of those fools who believes in the "Greater Serbia". FYI, there is no greater Serbia, in fact they have to be one of the most conquered groups in all of Europe.Originally posted by: kleinesarschloch
thanks for providing an unbiased source.![]()
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: kleinesarschloch
thanks for providing an unbiased source.![]()
I take it you would have rather had something from an unbiased source like theguardian.co.uk
or this one Googled it in case you are wondering
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: kleinesarschloch
thanks for providing an unbiased source.![]()
I take it you would have rather had something from an unbiased source like theguardian.co.uk
or this one Googled it in case you are wondering
That was government BS. Milosevic didn't not perform genocide on anyone. The Albanians wanted their own state which they had NO RIGHT to do. There was a war and people died. It happens all the time. This time it was labeled as "genocide". It was funny when they couldn't find any mass graves and it is also funny that Kosovo is a terrorist state which supports Osama Bin Laden. I wonder what the US would think if all the Irish in America banded together to make their own country in say New York. What a crock. Same goes with Russia who were bad mouthed by the US for attacking the poor little chechen terrorists. http://www.tv.cbc.ca/national/pgminfo/russia/
Isn't Andy looking for you?
Wasn't Milosevic the head honcho, knew about what was going on, and did nothing about it, thus encouraging it.
Using your logic...
How many jews did Hitler actually kill, I mean actually pull the trigger and kill them himself?